Prof Write was a decent word processor and the other software in the PFS series 
were good as well - PFS Plan as a spreadsheet and PFS File for a database. File 
was a flat file rather than relational but did have some handy form filling 
capabilities. 

-p

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 25, 2015, at 2:18 PM, John <sesso...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> The first word processor I used was Professional Write (aka Pfs:Write).
> 
> It had a *VERY* typewriter like interface that allowed you to adjust
> margins & tabs on a ruler that ran across the top of the screen.
> 
> Simple controls - Ctrl+B for Boldface, Ctrl+U to underline ...
> Ctrl+Enter started a new page. All the controls were simple toggles so
> Ctrl+B turned it on and Ctrl+B again turned it off. It also supported
> "Cut/Copy and Paste" (Ctrl+X, Ctrl+C & Ctrl+V) and you could use a mouse
> to position the cursor & drag to select text.
> 
> The thing that WordPerfect had going for it was the number of printers
> it supported, and Professional Write could use any printer that had a
> WordPerfect driver.
> 
> 
>> On 3/24/2015 11:01 PM, John Coyle wrote:
>> First WP software I used was WordPerfect - the name tells a lie, it was an 
>> absolute nightmare to use
>> compared with Word, when Word arrived I switched in a heartbeat!  I also 
>> used Lotus WordPro, not as
>> good as Word in some ways but had advantages in others - like allowing me to 
>> define a custom
>> envelope size before Microsoft acknowledged sizes other than American.  Sill 
>> use it for some
>> purposes - you can tell it was well-written software when it was created in 
>> 1997 and still works on
>> Windows 7.
>> 
>> 
>> John in Brisbane
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ralf R Radermacher
>> Sent: Wednesday, 25 March 2015 7:20 AM
>> To: pdml@pdml.net
>> Subject: Re: What does everyone now use?
>> 
>>> Am 24.03.15 um 21:43 schrieb steve harley:
>>> 
>>> i chose Amiga for the affordability, the multi-tasking OS and the fact
>>> it did four channels of 8-bit digital audio
>> 
>> Not to forget the graphics. Far better than what any IBM compatible PC had 
>> to offer, at least in the
>> early days. In the end, I had an A3000T with a 50 MHz 68060 accelerator 
>> board. The absolutely
>> brilliant Shapeshifter (some sort of Parallels to make Mac OS run on an 
>> Amiga) made it the fastest
>> 68060 Mac that Apple never built.
>> 
>> Word Perfect as a word processor wasn't that bad either.
>> 
>> Ralf
>> 
>> --
>> Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog  : 
>> http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
>> Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
>> Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to