For me, I find that zooms tend to help me to take good snapshots.
Primes tend to make me think more about what I am trying to do.  Along
the same lines as an earlier discussion about how Medium Format forces
one to think a bit more about the shot due to 10 frames per roll.
Primes tend to make me think more about the focal length I really want
to work with because changing lenses is much slower than zooming.
Another way to put it is that with a prime, I tend to try to "create"
the picture and with a zoom I tend to "record" what I am seeing.

Each has their place and I use zooms when I am taking snapshots.  When
I am try to create a serious picture, I use a prime.


Bruce Dayton



Sunday, May 12, 2002, 11:16:49 PM, you wrote:

BR> Brian,
BR>     The bottom line is "what works best for the individual" and the
BR> photography they do.
BR>     For me, I had used primes only from 1968 until 89 (with the exception of
BR> a Vivitar zoom I bought in 71 and returned the following day). In 1989, I
BR> bought my first AF camera and zooms - feeling that the optical quality had
BR> improved. That lasted until 1999 when, by chance, I drug our my old
BR> Spotmatic and a few lenses for a comparison shoot to see how far optics had
BR> advanced in 30 years. The AF gear was sold to fund a LX and I have been
BR> happier ever since. What the primes did was to remind me of how to see
BR> again.
BR>     Again, this is personal and many may have only learned photography with
BR> the latest AF cameras and Lenses. The trend can always be noted every time
BR> one pops into a camera store.

BR> Bob
BR> ----- Original Message -----
BR> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BR> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BR> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:07 PM
BR> Subject: Re: Do zooms teach visual discipline? Was: Advice Needed For
BR> Student


>> In <003001c1fa36$8a17ad30$1502a8c0@rappr>, on 05/13/02
>>    at 02:26 PM, Bob Rapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> |>Your legs are "painted on" and don't want to walk closer.
>>
>> I really have an hard time understanding how this canard got started
>> much less gets repeated.  Walking is not the same as zooming.
>> Perspective changes,  subjects escape,  proximity offends, bridges and
>> sheer drops do not permit getting closer even if they were equivalent.
>>
>>
>>
>> |>As a stop-gap until you can afford primes.
>>
>> sure lets shoot that scene off the end of the dock with an 85mm prime
>> then switch to a 150 for a detail and then switch to that 300 for
>> another more distant detail.  Primes have advantages but stacking them
>> up as a replacement for a zoom is not among them just as zooms have
>> their very real place in the tool kit but an f3.5 zoom at 50mm is no
>> replacement for an f1.4 50mm.
>>
>> differing philosophies but more agree with you than with me.
>>
>>
>> Bran
>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> Any Discordian is expressedly forbidden to believe what she reads.
>> -Discordian Catma
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
>> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
BR> -
BR> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
BR> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
BR> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to