Artur wrote: > Indeed. But I think that the majority of the MF cameras are being used in > studios. IMHO this is where Pentax strategy is quite inconsistent.
No, there's nothing incosistent in making cameras indended for outside studio use. Pentax have been very consistent in this. > Yes, you're right - film cameras will become tools for hobbyists only... Most of the nature and stock photography market is still using fim... > Actually I don't really see any feature that Canon or Nikon could add to the > F5 or EOS1v. They are pretty much complete bodies. This has been said about almost all cameras at one point... >But Pentax could do it. > Unfortunately, you're probably right about those economical obstacles. > Perhaps something, what we on the PDML disscussed some time ago, would be > the solution: a modular camera - the one that accepts both films and CCD's, > has interchangeable prisms and viewfinders as well as boosters, battery > packs, external power sources etc...Combining it with new Ltd and * lenses, > that would support Image Stabilisation would be a powerful weapon. I believe Pentax is best served by something pointing back to the LX. Or perhaps they won'yt bother at all... Pål - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
