Peirce's "there were" means 'existent'. In the past, here, I've spoken of the "potential interpretant". In the hypothetical science that mathematics is, a pencil-lead streak forming a (rough but acceptable) circle signifies the hypothetical object of a perfect circle. In these cases the signs are still only signs within their triad; it's just that the object or interpretant doesn't need to be existent.

Matt

On 12/29/15 3:14 PM, Matt Faunce wrote:
On 12/29/15 2:56 PM, Sungchul Ji wrote:
Jon A, List,

Here is one quotation of Pierce cited in Charles Peirce's Guess at the Riddle (K. Sheriff, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1994):

"A sinsign may be index or icon. As index it is 'a sign which would, at once, (122915-1) lose the chracter wich makes it a sign if its object were removed, but would
not lose that character if there were no interpretant."
That's in CP 2.304

    "A sign is either an icon, an index, or a symbol. An icon is a
    sign which would possess the character which renders it
    significant, even though its object had no existence; such as a
    lead-pencil streak as representing a geometrical line. An index is
    a sign which would, at once, lose the character which makes it a
    sign if its object were removed, but would not lose that character
    if there were no interpretant. Such, for instance, is a piece of
    mould with a bullet-hole in it as sign of a shot; for without the
    shot there would have been no hole; but there is a hole there,
    whether anybody has the sense to attribute it to a shot or not. A
    symbol is a sign which would lose the character which renders it a
    sign if there were no interpretant. Such is any utterance of
    speech which signifies what it does only by virtue of its being
    understood to have that signification."

calvert Frome calvert Frome

So it seems to me that (122915-1) establishes the concept of a *dyadic sign*.

Therefore,

"Not all signs are triadic."     (122915-2)

as some Peirceans on this list seem to believe.

All the best.

Sung
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to