I think it is unquestionable that we have a link to the future since it is impossible to conceive of the PM working without there being some consideration based on what is to come -- the practical result of consideration. Garnier-Malet has explored this but I do not think his work is essential to understanding this as a necessary inference from Peirce himself. The quantum confirmation of this will probably eventuate soon.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
