Steven W McDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> DS> Some things we can guarantee to be atomic. > >> This is going to be tricky. A list of atomic guarentees by perl will be >> needed. > >>From RFC 178 > >...we have to decide which operations are [atomic]. As a starting >point, we can take all the operators documented in C<perlop.pod> and >all the functions documented in C<perlfunc.pod> as [atomic]. Presumably _ONLY_ in the absence of tie and overload: use overload '.' => 'do_add'; sub do_add { open(my $socket = "http://www. ...") ... } > > >- SWM -- Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... raptor
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Glenn King
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Alan Burlison