>>>>> "DC" == Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DC> Uri wrote: >> that clears it up. so the key/value named params get converted to scalar >> args in INIT with the same name. is this in any of the current exegeses? >> or will sub calls be covered in the apocalyptic future? DC> A3/E3 covered named arguments. The only additional bit here is DC> that arguments (named of otherwise) given to the standard C<new> DC> constructoir are passed on to the standard INIT initializer. but from this thread it looks like you and larry are still hammering out the details. :) maybe a revision of A3/E3 will be in the offing (like larry's retraction of dropping <>). uri -- Uri Guttman --------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------- http://www.sysarch.com SYStems ARCHitecture and Stem Development ------ http://www.stemsystems.com Search or Offer Perl Jobs -------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org
