Michael Fowler wrote:
> I'm not sure exactly what you consider to be a "true multiline comment", but
> Perl definitely has them by my definition.
>
> =pod
>
> Hi, this is a multiline comment.
>
> =cut
...and there are a lot WORSE ways to do this in current Perl:
sub multiline-comment {}
multiline-comment(<<END);
Okay, this is my comment.
Nasty.
END
So very much better to have a nice standard syntax and stop taking
advantage of Perl's willingness to bend over backwards. ;-)
~ j.
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Martyn J. Pearce
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Barnette
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Barnette
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: multiline comments Glenn Linderman
