On 2019-12-07 01:37, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
On 7 Dec 2019, at 01:17, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users <perl6-users@perl.org>
wrote:
Oh and not to beat a dead horse, but perl 5's perldocs
wipes raku's docs face.
Now, that is what *I* call vulgar.
Interesting. It means it outdoes you by quiet a bit.
Another way of sayig it would be "left you in its
dust". I don't even want to know what you interpreted
it as. Maybe there is some translation peculiarity?
So it is possible to write
a doc reference that serves both the developer and
the user. Raku just does not want to.
Raku is a collection of volunteers. You seem to be a user of all the goodies
that Raku brings. Yet you appear to refuse to contribute to the project. So
I'd argue you should be glad at what you get.
How do you figure?
I just don't have the time to put up with the guard dog.
I did try a bit ago and gave up. You have to argue and
argue and argue.
Other parts, I am happy to contribute were I can. I
am light years behind you, so if you mean development level,
probably not in this lifetime would I catch up to you.
Did I hurt your feeling by saying the docs stink?
Compared to Perl 5's, Perl 6's are really are awful.
