Rakudo Weekly cannot serve as an offical channel. First of all, because it is "Rakudo" weekly, not "Raku". There is a good reason for this. Second, because it's weekly and I don't see why its format should be changed. We may need to have more prompt response in certain cases. Third, it's first and foremost is a personal project of Elizabeth, and I wish it remains this way because this is one of the things which makes it so interesting and valuable.
Best regards, Vadim Belman > On Mar 14, 2021, at 7:30 AM, yary <not....@gmail.com> wrote: > > The Rakudo Weekly blog gives me a sense of what's going on in the Raku world, > when I remember to check it! https://rakudoweekly.blog/about-rakudo-weekly/ > <https://rakudoweekly.blog/about-rakudo-weekly/> > > That site isn't quite what's called for in therms of community discussion and > announcements, but is a decent "organic" overview of what's happening in Raku > lists & blog spaces. > > -y > > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 3:32 AM Darren Duncan <dar...@darrenduncan.net > <mailto:dar...@darrenduncan.net>> wrote: > On 2021-03-13 2:27 p.m., Vadim Belman wrote: > > Concerning the accidental duplication of projects, aside of the fact that > > it is dissipation of scarce community resources, the good side is that > > there will be two options to choose from. I will be happy to see both > > project launched. One could eventually become part of the official site, > > the other may be ran independently. One way or another I hope there will be > > more gains from it than loses. > > These projects could be merged if both authors are conducive to it, now that > this is known. > > If there is reason for them to stay separate, I don't see why they can't BOTH > be > official sites, like Version 1 plus Version A, no reason to have to pick one. > > -- Darren Duncan
