Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
I'm leaning towards the idea of trying out all the spellings of the
database encoding we have in encoding_match_list. That gives the best
user experience, as it just works, and it doesn't seem that complicated.
How were you going to check --- use that idea of translating a string
that's known to have a translation? OK, but you'd better document
somewhere where translators will read it "you must translate this string
first of all". Maybe use a special string "Translate Me First" that
doesn't actually need to be end-user-visible, just so no one sweats over
getting it right in context.
Yep, something like that. There seems to be a magic empty string
translation at the beginning of every po file that returns the
meta-information about the translation, like translation author and
date. Assuming that works reliably, I'll use that.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
