On Sep 24, 2013, at 10:42 , kilon <theki...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > I agree, Morphic is quite messy but its design is very solid. Its just like > any huge library need to go under a cleanup phase and be improved.
Depends on what you want you mean by solid. For exploratory visual programming, it's a solid design. For building GUIs from standard components and a clear separation of responsibilities between a morphs constituent parts (*parts* you say? who needs that, we're all morphs!), it's much less solid than say, MVC/MVP. Cheers, Henry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
