+1
Nicolas Cellier wrote > SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV. > What is so much pharo specific in this library? > Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split? > > 2016-03-02 14:56 GMT+01:00 Serge Stinckwich < > serge.stinckwich@ > >: > >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Tudor Girba < > tudor@ > > wrote: >> > This is great news! >> > >> > I would be interested in time series and distributions as well. >> >> Distributions are already there. I start some early work on time series. >> >> -- >> Serge Stinckwich >> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ >> >> -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Call-about-Numerical-Methods-in-Pharo-tp4881998p4882033.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
