--- Begin Message ---
Why just don't we honor Didier H. Besset and leave it as it was, Numerical 
Methods in Smalltalk?
That way, regardless of your favorite Smalltalk implementation, there will 
always be a "Numerical Methods in Smalltalk" package somewhere!
The same way there's no GlorpPharo : it's Glorp everywhere!
 ----------------- 
Benoît St-Jean 
Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean 
Twitter: @BenLeChialeux 
Pinterest: benoitstjean 
IRC: lamneth 
Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com 
"A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero".  (A. Einstein)

      From: Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com>
 To: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 1:43 PM
 Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Call about Numerical Methods in Pharo :)
   
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Nicolas Cellier
<nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV.
> What is so much pharo specific in this library?
> Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split?

We can think of a more neutral name.
Any idea for a new name ?

Regards,
-- 
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/



  

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to