Could you use a metacello configuration named SciPharo composed of packaged that you would pick from a more neutral repository?
2016-03-04 8:28 GMT+01:00 Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-dev < pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org>: > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: Benoit St-Jean <bstj...@yahoo.com> > To: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > Cc: > Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 07:27:45 +0000 (UTC) > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Call about Numerical Methods in Pharo :) > Why just don't we honor Didier H. Besset and leave it as it was, Numerical > Methods in Smalltalk? > > That way, regardless of your favorite Smalltalk implementation, there will > always be a "Numerical Methods in Smalltalk" package somewhere! > > The same way there's no GlorpPharo : it's Glorp everywhere! > > ----------------- > Benoît St-Jean > Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean > Twitter: @BenLeChialeux > Pinterest: benoitstjean > IRC: lamneth > Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com > "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein) > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> > *To:* Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 1:43 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-dev] Call about Numerical Methods in Pharo :) > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Nicolas Cellier > <nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV. > > What is so much pharo specific in this library? > > Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split? > > We can think of a more neutral name. > Any idea for a new name ? > > Regards, > > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ > > > > >
