2016-08-18 19:50 GMT+02:00 stepharo <steph...@free.fr>: > Hi > > Why not use <example> pragma in the way you propose for <examplar>? Why we > need two? > > > Apparently from the old discussion, people like <example> to prompt and > open the example > when this is something visual. This is ok for me. >
Ok, let's distinguish them. Scripts are scripts (maybe <script> is better name than <example>?) I thought that we don't need two options because in practice <example> only opens morph or inspector. And for morphs we already have morph tab in inspector. So morph examples could be easily converted to <examplar> without any loss. > In my proposal we can get the best of both worlds. > - instance to use in tests > - instance to learn and tweak with GTInspector > - examples that we can see opening.
