Let me know. I do not care about examplar or sample.
Let us pick one that works well. I thought about prototype but this is
too close to prototype based language.
So we could get
<interactiveExample>
<sample>/<instance>/
Le 19/8/16 à 01:59, Ben Coman a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo
<emaring...@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-08-18 17:30 GMT-03:00 Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl>:
On 18/08/16 14:38, stepharo wrote:
Hi
In my projects I start to do the following:
I create <examplar> class method that returns an prototypical instance.
Nice. Excellent inititive. I'm not a native speaker, and <exemplar> does not
sound like the right name for this to me. That might be me being dutch.
Native speakers, is this the right name to use?
Semantically it is correct, but for me, also maybe by not being a
native English speaker, sounds weird.
I'd use something like "sample". However I'll be fine with whatever
you choose. But I'd choose something that doesn't sound weird to
native English readers, we already have some cases of that.
Regards,
Esteban A. Maringolo
In the previous thread I argued against <exemplar> and for <sample>,
but I'm not so strong in my conviction to push it again :). The
former is a little exotic, but is sufficient -- and perhaps its useful
<example> and <exemplar> sound similar with just a minor difference at
the end.
P.S. In terms of discover-ability about this difference, a passing
thought is it would be nice for newcomers to be able to hover over a
code like a pragma and get a tool tip popup.
cheers -ben
