Hi 2016-08-24 18:58 GMT+02:00 Hernán Morales Durand <hernan.mora...@gmail.com>:
> 2. Features that goes inside Pharo are not decided by vote. They have to >> add value and share the Pharo vision (pointed in the vision document who is >> not slightly updated but still guides our steps). We try to reach consensus >> and if it is not possible, then we decide. Yes, is like that… I’m sorry for >> not being perfect democratic but this was never the idea of Pharo (it *has* >> a benevolent dictator… who by the way is not me but a group, the board). >> >> > Ok, now people can see one reason why Pharo is light years from the > popularity of other OSS. I don't get how do you expect success with Pharo > if you never change your mindset... I read a lot of papers and see KDE, > gcc, Linux, NetBeans, Python, Mozilla, Apache collaboration models... never > *ever* read something like that, specially now where OSS literature is > considering distributed democracy. > I would say Pharo is still too young. And Pharo parents want to bring up it in own way. I think at some point Pharo could become adult enough to move away from parents (in good meaning of these words:) (without losing respect to parents vision)).
