Of course you are right ... if one has nothing constructive to say, then one 
shouldn't say anything at all:)

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Benoit St-Jean" <[email protected]>
| To: [email protected]
| Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 5:59:40 PM
| Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] 1.4 - better from Jenkins
| 
| 
| 
| Before we even get to the details, we should make sure we all
| exchange on a polite and non agressive tone.
| 
| 
| That being said, I don't think Bill is whining. You never hear people
| who don't care. I don't give a damn about product X, environment Y
| and programming language Z. That's why I never complain (or whine)
| about X, Y or Z. On the other hand, that's why you'll hear me
| complain about Smalltalk, Pharo, mathematics and a few other topics.
| Why? Because I care!
| 
| 
| Saying stuff don't work shouldn't be perceived as an ad hominem
| attack. It just shows someone, somewhere, somehow had an interest to
| say it so it gets fixed. And please, no "if you're no happy why
| don't you fix it and contribute" answer... This is the kind of
| answer that made me walk away from Pharo at a certain point...
| 
| 
| If we can't take critics/bugs/suggestions/tickets/whatever without
| entering a "defensive mode", we won't get far.
| 
| 
| Let's keep it cool and remember that nobody forced anyone to use
| Pharo and read this mailing list and take the time to post.
| 
| 
| We're all here because we do care!
| 
| 
| -----------------
| Benoit St-Jean
| Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean
| A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero.
| (Albert Einstein)
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| From: Dale Henrichs <[email protected]>
| To: [email protected]
| Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 8:33:20 PM
| Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] 1.4 - better from Jenkins
| 
| Bill,
| 
| The last time you complained about Metacello being broken I asked you
| for a stack trace and I have seen no stack trace, although I believe
| that you were able to confirm that Metacello worked fine until you
| loaded some of your own code into the system ...
| 
| Here you are complaining again ... if you don't provide specifics,
| the issues cannot be resolved ...
| 
| There are apparently a lot of moving parts in your system, so it
| takes great attention to detail to get such a system running
| smoothly. The fact that you don't provide specifics tells me that
| perhaps you are not paying attention to the details ...
| 
| When you are porting to a new environment (for you) like Pharo 1.4,
| you should stop and isolate the FIRST ERROR that you encounter ...
| in a complicated system once an error occurs, all bets are off ...
| You MUST pay attention to details ...
| 
| You state that you have a giant debug log ... so it sounds like you
| tried to keep moving forward in the face of initial errors...I say
| good luck with that approach!
| 
| If you post a Metacello stack trace I can very likely tell you what
| went wrong, if you prefer to continue to whine and complain about
| Metacello without even attempting to help me characterize the
| issues, then I will leave you to your own devices and you can can
| complain about Metacello all you want --- I won't be paying
| attention any more:)
| 
| Dale
| 
| 
| ----- Original Message -----
| | From: "Wilhelm K Schwab" < [email protected] >
| | To: [email protected]
| | Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 4:26:27 PM
| | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] 1.4 - better from Jenkins
| | 
| | I think you might be right about loading the .mcz files. But I
| | don't
| | have an expectation other than what has been said here many times:
| | that Metacello is the future. So far, I don't see it.
| | 
| | Bill
| | 
| | 
| | ________________________________________
| | From: [email protected]
| | [ [email protected] ] on behalf of Yanni
| | Chiu [ [email protected] ]
| | Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 6:22 PM
| | To: [email protected]
| | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] 1.4 - better from Jenkins
| | 
| | On 09/02/12 5:39 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
| | > Sven,
| | > 
| | > Fair enough, but the game plan is for people to use Metacello
| | > configurations to load what they need to build an image. I am
| | > attempting to do just that, and am reporting (rather negative so
| | > far) experience, with debug logs.
| | > 
| | > Pharo's fault or not, something is broken. But if Pharo is going
| | > to send users into the current state of Metacello, the weather
| | > around the lighthouse is going to be grim.
| | > 
| | > Interesting ideas about the package cache being damaged. Maybe
| | > the
| | > logs will reveal something??
| | 
| | You might want to check the package cache for 0-length .mcz files,
| | which
| | might happen when the server is down.
| | 
| | When I upgrade to a new image version, I just start my build
| | process
| | with the new image, and cross my fingers. If it fails, then I do it
| | manually with the build script in a workspace - select each
| | framework/package and "doIt". Sometimes I run the framework's
| | tests,
| | after each step.
| | 
| | I load all "community" code first, unless I have extensions to this
| | code. Sometimes I've had to upgrade to a newer version of the
| | framework,
| | if available. At other times, I had to create patches because I was
| | tracking the Pharo updates (so no fixed version was available yet).
| | 
| | In extreme cases, I've had to generate the list of packages that
| | Metacello would load, then load each .mcz individually.
| | 
| | Typically, I'd do "save image as" at various points, to be able to
| | get
| | back to the problem code, more quickly.
| | 
| | I think you're pretty much following a similar process, except the
| | expectation that a Metacello configuration should just load without
| | problems on Pharo1.4-unstable is too optimistic.
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| 

Reply via email to