> I meant that we should use the Pivot logo as the favicon rather than the > Apache logo. Ah, Ok ... but I have to see, favicon creation is not well supported in many tools, so I have to see what/how to do it, and overwrite the existing ... I hope tomorrow.
> If it looks good scaled down from 256x256, I don't think we need two separate > versions. Yes, but both looks not so good (as icons, in the Desktop, because the generated 256x256 image looks very good, you can see it in sources), so I'd keep the 256x256 so we could use also for other things ... also if we have 20 KB used more. In this case the problem is not in the scaling algorithm (probably some trouble here in the algorithm used by Windows or by Java under Windows) but in shapes of our logo, or better the text is thin and little, and curved elements have problems with antialiasing. I'll try also applying a smooth filter on the image and see if after this, looks a little better ... but I think we could be satisfied by the current result. Or tell me if you don't like it too much, and I'll what to do. Bye
