Today, FBI Director Comey stated that the FBI is “investigating”; and DNI (NSA Chief) Admiral Mike Rogers answered that approximately 20 people within his NSA organization had the potential to "Un-Mask" and/or leak to the media; who the American was that was caught talking on a wiretapped conversation with the Russian Ambassador....Comey concurred with Rogers.
How can a congressional committee conduct an investigation if they don’t know if the primary witness, the lead investigator, is the source of the leaks? Wouldn’t the very first step, the actual basis of the foundation for the investigation itself, be to ensure the person conducting the investigation did not participate in the illegality of the conduct being investigated? *Comey: Obama Political Appointees Had Ability To “Unmask” American Citizens* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI8Eag_9LJ8 -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
