I had no idea what you were talking about! So I watched about 5 videos of it and really think he was just telling them to stop clapping for him. I'm sure he's no fan of Trump's but I don't think he was that far gone (to do that); jmo.
Jeez he looked bad that night; right before he went to the hospital I think. I really don't want to live to 90, lol. On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 10:15:38 PM UTC-4, gtheist957 wrote: > > Way back during the campaign remember when poppa bush made the throat > slashing gesture to Trump?well this is all part ofit > > On Mar 20, 2017 8:37 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> Oh I agree he wouldn't admit to an investigation about the leaks nor >> promise one would come. But I do think Gowdy have him a deadline for an >> indictment at the very least. >> >> How does him disputing falsehoods in the media automatically indicate >> they are involved or abusing their powers? We don't know what things he's >> talking about, but I'm guessing the back-to-back hit pieces by the NYT on >> 1/19 and 1/20 about wiretaps are two of them. >> >> I also think they should have come out LONG before now and chastised the >> democrats who continue to claim that the Trump campaign colluded with the >> Russians. And why in the hell didn't one of those republicans ask him about >> Russian attempts to break into the RNC today? Or how that dumbass John >> Podesta replying to an obvious phishing scam with his password "password" >> was more to blame than anything? >> >> On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 9:16:21 PM UTC-4, btdt100 wrote: >>> >>> I don't think he said there was an on going investigation on the leaks. >>> He said he couldn't talk about it, more specifically when asked by Gowdy, >>> that 'he couldn't assure the public there will be an investigation on the >>> leaks in the future. >>> >>> Disputing press reports opens the can of worms to the fact that they are >>> abusing their wiretapping powers and more importantly, they are involved in >>> the leaks. >>> >>> >>> On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:52:31 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Wow, very good question, Keith. >>>> >>>> I was watching some of it and as always, Tray Goudy asked the most >>>> pertinent questions. I loved how he pretty much told Comey that if someone >>>> wasn't in prison by the time that law comes up for review this summer that >>>> it won't be renewed. Nicely played. >>>> >>>> Personally I thought the republicans were overly cautious in the >>>> questions they asked. They didn't grandstand like the dems did, and >>>> because >>>> the dems were doing it non-stop, the republicans probably should have >>>> gotten a little bit more in the record than they did. I'd also like to >>>> know >>>> why there is no mechanism for the FBI to immediately dispute falsehoods >>>> when published or repeated by the mainstream media. I mean, wtf? What are >>>> they afraid of? Especially now, since he said today that there is an >>>> ongoing investigation; if that's the case, then everyone knows it and it's >>>> a matter of public record. I think they now have a OBLIGATION to correct >>>> shit put out there in the public sphere that is fake news. >>>> >>>> On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:52:22 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>> >>>>> (Yet not a single congressional intelligence committee member would >>>>> ask Rogers or Comey -under oath- if they were the source of: A) “The >>>>> Unmasking”, and/or B) “The Leaking”. Stop for a moment and think >>>>> about that glaring and I surmise the intentional non inquiry against the >>>>> expressed intention of the purpose of this committee....) >>>>> >>>>> And Brine calls it paranoia..... >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Today, FBI Director Comey stated that the FBI is “investigating”; and >>>>>> DNI (NSA Chief) Admiral Mike Rogers answered that approximately 20 >>>>>> people >>>>>> within his NSA organization had the potential to "Un-Mask" and/or leak >>>>>> to >>>>>> the media; who the American was that was caught talking on a wiretapped >>>>>> conversation with the Russian Ambassador....Comey concurred with Rogers. >>>>>> >>>>>> How can a congressional committee conduct an investigation if they >>>>>> don’t know if the primary witness, the lead investigator, is the source >>>>>> of >>>>>> the leaks? Wouldn’t the very first step, the actual basis of the >>>>>> foundation for the investigation itself, be to ensure the person >>>>>> conducting >>>>>> the investigation did not participate in the illegality of the conduct >>>>>> being investigated? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Comey: Obama Political Appointees Had Ability To “Unmask” American >>>>>> Citizens* >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI8Eag_9LJ8 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
