Way back during the campaign remember when poppa bush made the throat slashing gesture to Trump?well this is all part ofit
On Mar 20, 2017 8:37 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < [email protected]> wrote: > > Oh I agree he wouldn't admit to an investigation about the leaks nor > promise one would come. But I do think Gowdy have him a deadline for an > indictment at the very least. > > How does him disputing falsehoods in the media automatically indicate they > are involved or abusing their powers? We don't know what things he's > talking about, but I'm guessing the back-to-back hit pieces by the NYT on > 1/19 and 1/20 about wiretaps are two of them. > > I also think they should have come out LONG before now and chastised the > democrats who continue to claim that the Trump campaign colluded with the > Russians. And why in the hell didn't one of those republicans ask him about > Russian attempts to break into the RNC today? Or how that dumbass John > Podesta replying to an obvious phishing scam with his password "password" > was more to blame than anything? > > On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 9:16:21 PM UTC-4, btdt100 wrote: >> >> I don't think he said there was an on going investigation on the leaks. >> He said he couldn't talk about it, more specifically when asked by Gowdy, >> that 'he couldn't assure the public there will be an investigation on the >> leaks in the future. >> >> Disputing press reports opens the can of worms to the fact that they are >> abusing their wiretapping powers and more importantly, they are involved in >> the leaks. >> >> >> On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:52:31 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote: >>> >>> >>> Wow, very good question, Keith. >>> >>> I was watching some of it and as always, Tray Goudy asked the most >>> pertinent questions. I loved how he pretty much told Comey that if someone >>> wasn't in prison by the time that law comes up for review this summer that >>> it won't be renewed. Nicely played. >>> >>> Personally I thought the republicans were overly cautious in the >>> questions they asked. They didn't grandstand like the dems did, and because >>> the dems were doing it non-stop, the republicans probably should have >>> gotten a little bit more in the record than they did. I'd also like to know >>> why there is no mechanism for the FBI to immediately dispute falsehoods >>> when published or repeated by the mainstream media. I mean, wtf? What are >>> they afraid of? Especially now, since he said today that there is an >>> ongoing investigation; if that's the case, then everyone knows it and it's >>> a matter of public record. I think they now have a OBLIGATION to correct >>> shit put out there in the public sphere that is fake news. >>> >>> On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:52:22 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>> >>>> (Yet not a single congressional intelligence committee member would >>>> ask Rogers or Comey -under oath- if they were the source of: A) “The >>>> Unmasking”, and/or B) “The Leaking”. Stop for a moment and think >>>> about that glaring and I surmise the intentional non inquiry against the >>>> expressed intention of the purpose of this committee....) >>>> >>>> And Brine calls it paranoia..... >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Today, FBI Director Comey stated that the FBI is “investigating”; and >>>>> DNI (NSA Chief) Admiral Mike Rogers answered that approximately 20 people >>>>> within his NSA organization had the potential to "Un-Mask" and/or leak to >>>>> the media; who the American was that was caught talking on a wiretapped >>>>> conversation with the Russian Ambassador....Comey concurred with Rogers. >>>>> >>>>> How can a congressional committee conduct an investigation if they >>>>> don’t know if the primary witness, the lead investigator, is the source of >>>>> the leaks? Wouldn’t the very first step, the actual basis of the >>>>> foundation for the investigation itself, be to ensure the person >>>>> conducting >>>>> the investigation did not participate in the illegality of the conduct >>>>> being investigated? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Comey: Obama Political Appointees Had Ability To “Unmask” American >>>>> Citizens* >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI8Eag_9LJ8 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
