(Yet not a single congressional intelligence committee member would ask Rogers or Comey -under oath- if they were the source of: A) “The Unmasking”, and/or B) “The Leaking”. Stop for a moment and think about that glaring and I surmise the intentional non inquiry against the expressed intention of the purpose of this committee....)
And Brine calls it paranoia..... On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Today, FBI Director Comey stated that the FBI is “investigating”; and DNI > (NSA Chief) Admiral Mike Rogers answered that approximately 20 people > within his NSA organization had the potential to "Un-Mask" and/or leak to > the media; who the American was that was caught talking on a wiretapped > conversation with the Russian Ambassador....Comey concurred with Rogers. > > How can a congressional committee conduct an investigation if they don’t > know if the primary witness, the lead investigator, is the source of the > leaks? Wouldn’t the very first step, the actual basis of the foundation > for the investigation itself, be to ensure the person conducting the > investigation did not participate in the illegality of the conduct being > investigated? > > > *Comey: Obama Political Appointees Had Ability To “Unmask” American > Citizens* > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI8Eag_9LJ8 > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
