He'd really trashed JEB pretty good by then. On Mar 20, 2017 11:23 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < [email protected]> wrote:
> > I had no idea what you were talking about! So I watched about 5 videos of > it and really think he was just telling them to stop clapping for him. I'm > sure he's no fan of Trump's but I don't think he was that far gone (to do > that); jmo. > > Jeez he looked bad that night; right before he went to the hospital I > think. I really don't want to live to 90, lol. > > On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 10:15:38 PM UTC-4, gtheist957 wrote: >> >> Way back during the campaign remember when poppa bush made the throat >> slashing gesture to Trump?well this is all part ofit >> >> On Mar 20, 2017 8:37 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Oh I agree he wouldn't admit to an investigation about the leaks nor >>> promise one would come. But I do think Gowdy have him a deadline for an >>> indictment at the very least. >>> >>> How does him disputing falsehoods in the media automatically indicate >>> they are involved or abusing their powers? We don't know what things he's >>> talking about, but I'm guessing the back-to-back hit pieces by the NYT on >>> 1/19 and 1/20 about wiretaps are two of them. >>> >>> I also think they should have come out LONG before now and chastised the >>> democrats who continue to claim that the Trump campaign colluded with the >>> Russians. And why in the hell didn't one of those republicans ask him about >>> Russian attempts to break into the RNC today? Or how that dumbass John >>> Podesta replying to an obvious phishing scam with his password "password" >>> was more to blame than anything? >>> >>> On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 9:16:21 PM UTC-4, btdt100 wrote: >>>> >>>> I don't think he said there was an on going investigation on the >>>> leaks. He said he couldn't talk about it, more specifically when asked by >>>> Gowdy, that 'he couldn't assure the public there will be an investigation >>>> on the leaks in the future. >>>> >>>> Disputing press reports opens the can of worms to the fact that they >>>> are abusing their wiretapping powers and more importantly, they are >>>> involved in the leaks. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:52:31 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Wow, very good question, Keith. >>>>> >>>>> I was watching some of it and as always, Tray Goudy asked the most >>>>> pertinent questions. I loved how he pretty much told Comey that if someone >>>>> wasn't in prison by the time that law comes up for review this summer that >>>>> it won't be renewed. Nicely played. >>>>> >>>>> Personally I thought the republicans were overly cautious in the >>>>> questions they asked. They didn't grandstand like the dems did, and >>>>> because >>>>> the dems were doing it non-stop, the republicans probably should have >>>>> gotten a little bit more in the record than they did. I'd also like to >>>>> know >>>>> why there is no mechanism for the FBI to immediately dispute falsehoods >>>>> when published or repeated by the mainstream media. I mean, wtf? What are >>>>> they afraid of? Especially now, since he said today that there is an >>>>> ongoing investigation; if that's the case, then everyone knows it and it's >>>>> a matter of public record. I think they now have a OBLIGATION to correct >>>>> shit put out there in the public sphere that is fake news. >>>>> >>>>> On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:52:22 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> (Yet not a single congressional intelligence committee member would >>>>>> ask Rogers or Comey -under oath- if they were the source of: A) “The >>>>>> Unmasking”, and/or B) “The Leaking”. Stop for a moment and think >>>>>> about that glaring and I surmise the intentional non inquiry against the >>>>>> expressed intention of the purpose of this committee....) >>>>>> >>>>>> And Brine calls it paranoia..... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Today, FBI Director Comey stated that the FBI is “investigating”; >>>>>>> and DNI (NSA Chief) Admiral Mike Rogers answered that approximately 20 >>>>>>> people within his NSA organization had the potential to "Un-Mask" and/or >>>>>>> leak to the media; who the American was that was caught talking on a >>>>>>> wiretapped conversation with the Russian Ambassador....Comey concurred >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> Rogers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How can a congressional committee conduct an investigation if they >>>>>>> don’t know if the primary witness, the lead investigator, is the source >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> the leaks? Wouldn’t the very first step, the actual basis of the >>>>>>> foundation for the investigation itself, be to ensure the person >>>>>>> conducting >>>>>>> the investigation did not participate in the illegality of the conduct >>>>>>> being investigated? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Comey: Obama Political Appointees Had Ability To “Unmask” American >>>>>>> Citizens* >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI8Eag_9LJ8 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
