Wow, very good question, Keith. I was watching some of it and as always, Tray Goudy asked the most pertinent questions. I loved how he pretty much told Comey that if someone wasn't in prison by the time that law comes up for review this summer that it won't be renewed. Nicely played.
Personally I thought the republicans were overly cautious in the questions they asked. They didn't grandstand like the dems did, and because the dems were doing it non-stop, the republicans probably should have gotten a little bit more in the record than they did. I'd also like to know why there is no mechanism for the FBI to immediately dispute falsehoods when published or repeated by the mainstream media. I mean, wtf? What are they afraid of? Especially now, since he said today that there is an ongoing investigation; if that's the case, then everyone knows it and it's a matter of public record. I think they now have a OBLIGATION to correct shit put out there in the public sphere that is fake news. On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:52:22 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote: > > (Yet not a single congressional intelligence committee member would ask > Rogers or Comey -under oath- if they were the source of: A) “The > Unmasking”, and/or B) “The Leaking”. Stop for a moment and think about > that glaring and I surmise the intentional non inquiry against the > expressed intention of the purpose of this committee....) > > And Brine calls it paranoia..... > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Today, FBI Director Comey stated that the FBI is “investigating”; and DNI >> (NSA Chief) Admiral Mike Rogers answered that approximately 20 people >> within his NSA organization had the potential to "Un-Mask" and/or leak to >> the media; who the American was that was caught talking on a wiretapped >> conversation with the Russian Ambassador....Comey concurred with Rogers. >> >> How can a congressional committee conduct an investigation if they don’t >> know if the primary witness, the lead investigator, is the source of the >> leaks? Wouldn’t the very first step, the actual basis of the foundation >> for the investigation itself, be to ensure the person conducting the >> investigation did not participate in the illegality of the conduct being >> investigated? >> >> >> *Comey: Obama Political Appointees Had Ability To “Unmask” American >> Citizens* >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI8Eag_9LJ8 >> >> >> > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
