jgg,

Please show me where and how it is DEMANDED of 6th graders they use
same sex couples as ROLE MODELS.

On Nov 18, 11:17 am, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From the article
>
> >>> "We don't want to isolate children every day in their own classroom, or 
> >>> make them feel they're different," said Principal Michaela Martin.
>
> That is exactly what they are doing by requiring kids to go elsewhere
> to recite the pledge...   The simplest solution is to have the kids
> say it in the classroom with those kids who don't...   It would be a
> lesson in being tolerant of another's opinion in the Public
> Square...
>
> >>> Isn't it simply the adults scoring political points for one side or the 
> >>> other by using the kids and this pledge?
>
> Ah yes, the "kids are too dumb to understanding" straw man...  As this
> question applies to six graders also in this case, will you say the
> same about a 12 year old???   FYI there are kids as young as 5 or 6 to
> whom understanding of "God" or "Pledge" IS grasped...   Do not these
> kids have the right to say the Pledge???  Or is it the agenda of
> adults with a particular POV  who wish to impose the habit of
> EXCLUDING GOD from the Public Square???
>
> As to the purpose of the Pledge -- to instill a sense of duty owed to
> one's country and community...  And that IS  a valid educational
> goal...  As valid as the demand that families of same sex couples be
> used as role models...   The real issue here is WHOSE agenda is
> incorporated into the curriculum, the nutscases of the Left does not
> GOD or patriotism in the agenda on the whole...  And that IS A
> PROBLEM...
>
> On Nov 18, 11:26 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > jgg,
>
> > Maybe the question should be why does it matter to any rational person
> > WHERE the pledge is said?
> > Has anyone questioned at what age a kid is old enough to understand
> > the significance of what the pledge means? Ask a 2rd grader to define
> > the word "pledge" at certain ages is not the "pledge" simply like a
> > "song" or "poem" they have memorized w/o understanding the meaning or
> > significance? What is the real point here? Isn't it simply the adults
> > scoring political points for one side or the other by using the kids
> > and this pledge?
>
> > On Nov 18, 8:31 am, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > That Hollywood is the question in this matter...  Do not the students
> > > who wish to say the Pledge have the right to do it in their
> > > classroom?
>
> > > On Nov 17, 6:36 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > jjg,
>
> > > > Beats the fuck out of me.
>
> > > > On Nov 17, 3:23 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > So why make the kids who want to say it go to the gym...
>
> > > > > On Nov 17, 3:52 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > jgg,
>
> > > > > > This is all really simple. Kid wants to say it fine, kid dosen't 
> > > > > > want
> > > > > > to say it, fine. Someone is afraid a kid might be criticized for
> > > > > > either saying it or not saying it, toogh shit. that's likfe.
> > > > > > You DO know that the phrase "under God" was not an original part of
> > > > > > the pledge and was adding during the 1950"s "Oh my God the commie's
> > > > > > are going to get us" phase, right?
>
> > > > > > On Nov 17, 9:00 am, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Here is a current Separation where Secularist are seeking to 
> > > > > > > enforce
> > > > > > > their ban Religion from the Public Square...      The question is 
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > IF but when, where, and who...   A side note, isn't having the 
> > > > > > > kids
> > > > > > > who do not wish to say "under God" stay in the classrooms while 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > rest of the students go to the gym "isolating them"???
>
> > > > > > >http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20081114/NEWS/81114027
>
> > > > > > > >>> Unlike other Pledge controversies, this one centers on how 
> > > > > > > >>> and where schoolchildren say it, not whether they should be 
> > > > > > > >>> allowed to.
>
> > > > > > > In 1943, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that schoolchildren can opt 
> > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > of reciting the pledge for religious reasons.
>
> > > > > > > Sixty-one years later, the court said a California father couldn't
> > > > > > > challenge the Pledge of Allegiance, reversing a lower-court 
> > > > > > > decision
> > > > > > > saying teacher-led Pledge recitals in public schools were
> > > > > > > unconstitutional. That case involved an atheist who didn't want 
> > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > third-grader to have to listen to the phrase "under God."
>
> > > > > > > But it didn't rule on the constitutionality of compulsory 
> > > > > > > recitation.
>
> > > > > > > The brouhaha in the Vermont school began in September, when 
> > > > > > > parent Ted
> > > > > > > Tedesco began circulating petitions calling for its return as a 
> > > > > > > daily
> > > > > > > practice in the 19th-century schoolhouse, which has 55 children in
> > > > > > > grades kindergarten through six.
>
> > > > > > > School officials agreed to resume the pledge as a daily exercise, 
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > not in the classroom.
>
> > > > > > > "We don't want to isolate children every day in their own 
> > > > > > > classroom,
> > > > > > > or make them feel they're different," said Principal Michaela 
> > > > > > > Martin.
>
> > > > > > > Instead, starting last week, a sixth grade student was assigned 
> > > > > > > to go
> > > > > > > around to the four classrooms before classes started, gathering up
> > > > > > > anyone who wanted to say it and then walking them up creaky wooden
> > > > > > > steps to a second-floor gymnasium, where he led them in the 
> > > > > > > pledge.
>
> > > > > > > About half the students chose to participate, according to 
> > > > > > > Martin.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to