I am a partisan middle-of-the-roader... Left on some , right on others...
On Dec 27, 3:09 am, "mike [never forget] 532" <[email protected]> wrote: > i think he is telling the truth and he meant to type my name . he is a > fraudulent poster in the regard that he claims not be partisan and > has never posted anything even close to being middle of the road or > heaven forbid anti republican . > but i was really surprised when it looked he had called you a racial > name . i had never seen him do that before ! so i tend to believe him > when he says it was typo . > On Dec 26, 6:04 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > my response was for Mike and it did NOT inciminate. I do, indeed feel > > sorry for you. > > > You tell ME I don't know how to read documents and attach the correct > > meaning to the languge used in/by international diplomatic > > groups...... > > > It is hilarious... I worked for that body (UN) for 27 years (retired > > in Oct.) and read/wrote more reports/documents than have have even > > seen in your life. You ARE funny. They record every conversation in > > the chamber for just that reason.... meaning is always reverted to the > > oral explanation when one is formally given as all things do not > > translate. The quotes ARE empiracal in this matter... > > > PLEASE do some homework before trying to stick someone with US style > > foreign policy understanding. US policy has NO permanent successes in > > the last 50 years because of its' "me first" attitude that even the > > least of you (that would be you) exhibits. > > > On 12/26/08, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Is a mistype now to be seen as a racial slur??? We are > > > sensitive... Now if I had engaged in mindless name calling in > > > posting before, you might have a point... As I don't and have not, > > > perhaps this is another case of implication on your part which is not > > > supported by facts... > > > > Now my mother raised me to not just assume the worse in folks... The > > > shame, if any is to be had, is on you for LOOKING for racial slurs or > > > insults where none were to be had... You see, I assume we all are > > > fallible and liable to error and mis-assumption... So to offset that > > > very human trait, I overlook and forgive others for small stuff > > > because I know in time I will be the one who mistypes and is > > > uncivil... > > > > I also understand that on the political stage of trash talk, that > > > position is not favored -- what is favored is an active looking for > > > insult or slur wither one is intended or not... > > > > So I apologize if my typo made you assume it was a slur... I can see > > > how it could be... Please look into your HUMAN and acknowledge your > > > own human fallibility in finding guilt where there is none... This > > > reminds me of the Scarlett Letter and the good projecting Rev... > > > > On Dec 26, 4:25 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It's ok by me Mike. Judaism is passed Maternally. It is indeed my > > > > mothers side of the family that is Jewish. Racial slurs are spread > > > > only by those that have fear of those being slurred. > > > > > Check ANY racist... the bottom line for his attitude is always fear. > > > > > I feel sorry for jgg... nothing more, my mother raised me better, > > > > obviously his did not. > > > > > If, however it is against the rules (or not)... Shame on you JGG, and > > > > I really mean that. > > > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:30 PM, mike [never forget] 532 > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > be careful JGG i think that might be against the board rules . you > > > > > might want to check with WNCS to be sure . > > > > > > On Dec 26, 1:52 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Your are welcome Kike > > > > > >> On Dec 26, 12:48 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > Thanks LEW > > > > > >> > On 12/26/08, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > No it was NOT... > > > > > >> > > On Dec 26, 9:58 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > You fail to address the point once again Lew. > > > > > >> > > > Was the unilateral US action in concert with the UN or not ?? > > > > > >> > > > It is a simple question. > > > > > >> > > > On another level I ask; How can I be a liberal loon or qualify > > > > >> > > > for a > > > > >> > > > US political title when I do not live there ?? > > > > > >> > > > On 12/26/08, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > Dear UnAnnointed: > > > > > >> > > > > You, too, are a Liberal Loon. > > > > > >> > > > > On Dec 26, 9:29 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > I did not realize that the invasion of Iraq had anything > > > > >> > > > > > to do with > > > > >> > > > > > the UN. > > > > > >> > > > > > On Dec 26, 8:12 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > Mike: > > > > > >> > > > > > > Oh. > > > > > >> > > > > > > Then, here is why we went into Iraq: > > > > > >> > > > > > > The IRAQ invasion was L-E-G-AL and J-U-S-T-I-F-I-E-D. > > > > > >> > > > > > > Did you ever wonder why Saddam was a allowed to remain > > > > >> > > > > > > as president of > > > > >> > > > > > > Iraq after he got clobbered by the U.S. in the 1991 Gulf > > > > >> > > > > > > War? > > > > > >> > > > > > > Think he may have agreed to some surrender terms to > > > > >> > > > > > > allow him to stay > > > > >> > > > > > > in power? > > > > > >> > > > > > > Think he ever fulfilled those surrender terms?? > > > > > >> > > > > > > Read UN Resolution # 687. Saddam was given 15 days-- > > > > >> > > > > > > from April 3 > > > > >> > > > > > > until April 18, 1991 to fulfill the terms of his > > > > >> > > > > > > surrender. > > > > > >> > > > > > > By April of 2003 - 4,390 days AFTER his deadline, he > > > > >> > > > > > > still had not met > > > > >> > > > > > > the terms of his surrender. > > > > > >> > > > > > > Ever wonder why U.S. planes were over-flying Iraq all > > > > >> > > > > > > the years > > > > >> > > > > > > between 1991 and 2003, putting our pilots in danger? > > > > > >> > > > > > > P.S.: Read UN Resolution # 687 of April 3, 1991 THEN > > > > >> > > > > > > Read UN > > > > >> > > > > > > Resolution 1440 of the Fall of 2002 - which state that > > > > >> > > > > > > Saddam still > > > > >> > > > > > > had not fulfilled Resolution #687. > > > > > >> > > > > > > Do think you would be legally allowed to remain living > > > > >> > > > > > > in your house > > > > >> > > > > > > for 12 years (4,390 days) without ever making a mortgage > > > > >> > > > > > > payment - if > > > > >> > > > > > > you owed a mortgage??? > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Dec 26, 8:53 am, "mike [never forget] 532" > > > > > >> > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > i didn't say anything about needing it i said bush > > > > >> > > > > > > > invaded to gain > > > > >> > > > > > > > control of the Iraqi oil fields ! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Dec 26, 8:49 am, "[email protected]" > > > > >> > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Mikey: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > We don't need Iraqi oil. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Drill off our continental shelf. The fish don't > > > > >> > > > > > > > > mind and we own it. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Drill in ANWR. The caribou love it and we own it. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Why in the heck woul;d we want to go to Iraq for > > > > >> > > > > > > > > oil??? and we don't > > > > >> > > > > > > > > own it and they are a bunch of nuts. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Dec 26, 8:32 am, "mike [never forget] 532" > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > lew as hard as it is for you to understand it was > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > bush who ordered the > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > troops to Iraq in order to take control of the oil > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > fields . Not > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Obama ! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 26, 8:20 am, "[email protected]" > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Obama didn't bother them anyone on the > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > battlefield . > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > He only went a couple of times and voted against > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > the military every > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > chance he got. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Obama voted for "U.S. Death," and "Humiliating" > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > U.S. losses. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 26, 8:01 am, margareth > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I wonder how much of the war effort is > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > required for the frequent trips > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > made to the front lines by senior politicians. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I also wonder if all > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > the NCOs, and Privates get to have any free > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > time, or do they pull so > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > much guard duty that they are exhausted. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 26, 7:49 am, NavyBrat > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah...pretty cool. Too bad he got knocked > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > arround for a it bit. I'm > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > sure he thought it was well worth the insult > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > tho. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 26, 5:44 am, "mike [never forget] 532" > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i love the fact that the people of the > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > world see the man who paid bush > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the highest insult one person can give > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > another as a world hero . > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 26, 7:24 am, "[email protected]" > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > By P.J. Gladnick (Bio | Archive) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > December 25, 2008 - 18:25 ET > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mewsbusters.com > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Employees of McClatchy publishing in > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Iraq were in an unusually good > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mood recently. The occasion was the > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aftermath of the Iraqi journalist > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who tossed his shoes at President Bush > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at a press conference in > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Baghdad as you can see in these quotes > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from Inside Iraq, a blog for > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > McClatchy journalists working in that > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > country. The first quote was > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from McClatchy employee, "Laith," who > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was talking about his colleagues > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the rest of the quotes were from > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commentors who may or may not be > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
