how far behind are we in our UN dues now ?

On Dec 29, 6:21 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> You are so wrong. No other country has so blatantly and unilaterally
> resigned its legal positions within that body while screaming foul
> (including the former USSR).
>
> The example set would indeed be the example followed. None of the
> little "blocks" have the power to do anything without the collusion of
> the permanant members and it is the US that leads the way in broken
> treaties and persuit of unilateral self interest in that corps.
>
> Again I ask, when is your dead beat country going to pay a legally
> obligated debt to Nicaragua ??
>
> When are they going to stop playing military politics with countries
> that do not and could threaten your shores or direct commerce ??
>
> You have created your own problems and image then cry like babies when
> a new version of the OAS is formed and you are invited to stay out of
> it. There is now a defence treaty (somewhat like NATO, covering all of
> the Americas) and the US was denied membership and told their services
> were neither wanted or needed.
>
> Where is that on your MSM or even your self-riteous blogs from either
> side. As time goes on you will find that the US is not becoming
> isolationist, but isolated.
>
> Proof of this is showing up in refusals of what once were routine
> extradition requests for civil and even some felonious crimes... they
> are being refused off-hand with other nations quoting the US in their
> replies... "it is not in, nor does it serve, our purposes."
>
> You are starting to gain/reap that crop of bad seed. It  has only just begun.
>
> You are right in one regard, the language of diplomacy is indeed at
> times foggy and just like the manager of any disco if you want to know
> whats happening on the dance floor.... turn off YOUR machine first.
> Others are much better and work with far greater patience than your
> "NOW, I want  it NOW" society.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:28 PM, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The non functionality of the UN is in its DNA...  Any action requires
> > no veto from 5 countries...   Add to that the group think "don't blame
> > me" blocks of Arabs, Africans, of Tyrant-run countries -- that
> > Zimbabwe and African refusal to enforce human rights there...
>
> > Now I am sure the US does have some measure of blame...  Now when
> > Sudan who is actively engaging in genocide, is elected unanimously to
> > the Human Rights Commission because of the voting blocks more
> > interested in power than human rights, something is very wrong...
> > And that is not caused by the US or lack of the American example, but
> > by actions by small greedy states who care nothing or little about
> > human rights...   Or take the sex for food scandals in the many "peace
> > keeping missions"...  Little is done to enforce ethical conduct
> > there...
>
> > The UN is NOT capable of governing internationally, period...   It is
> > a tool to be used for PR on controversial issues the conflict with
> > powerful nation-states interests...   Blocks of lessor states use the
> > UN in a similar fashion...   So do not moan about the American lack of
> > leadership here...   The UN has all too often used the US military as
> > a beat cop and then demand the right to trash the beat cop...
>
> > The UN just got pissed off when Bush told them that THEY WERE
> > IRRELEVANT when it came to issues like rouge states as Saddam was or
> > Zimbabwe is...  Which of course they are when any national interest of
> > the Big Five are involved...   That is outside a public forum to
> > posture...
>
> > On Dec 29, 3:16 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> It is indeed non-functional when the US continues to ignore it and
> >> leads by that example. You claim to be a super power...... i say your
> >> governments actions are super slime. They act no better than a second
> >> rate used car salesman and then have the gall to ask why people don't
> >> like them...(just like the used car salesman).
>
> >> Just read an article in the Nica Times that says they figure they only
> >> have 6000 more land mines to remove........ guess who put them there.
>
> >> Guess whos has dropped out of every treaty they have signed within the
> >> UN when they felt it rubbed them the wrong way...... Gee, there is NO
> >> WAY a decision by the US could be wrong, now is there ??
>
> >> When will your dead-beat country pay the fine levied by the world
> >> court in the 80's for illegally laying those mines and mining the
> >> Managua Harbor ??  Want to visit the Killing fields there... I'd be
> >> happy to take you around so you can see what your pride has done and a
> >> memory as long as your collective manhood lasts.
>
> >> After you visit the killing fields we'll talk about directness of
> >> language and your inability to read anything but US English and
> >> understand translated language.
>
> >> You do not even BEGIN to have a clue.
>
> >> On 12/29/08, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > One stain of the UN is the scandal and corruption in the Oil for Food
> >> > program...   The almost total lack of honesty and transparency...   Or
> >> > the foolish Human Rights body who can only find abuse in Israel but
> >> > not in a Zimbabwe, Syria, Iran, or Venezuela...  Likewise the
> >> > ideological bias at the UN always has being telling...   It always has
> >> > been sad to see otherwise good people to use their talents to justify
> >> > a non functional body and their jobs...
>
> >> > I will still suggest language is a multipurpose tool, especially
> >> > diplomatic language -- to clarify, to confuse, to talk just plain old
> >> > talk BS, or to provide a CYA account for opposing sides...    Still
> >> > that you spent your working life there explains a great deal about
> >> > your confused set of facts and ideology...
>
> >> > On Dec 26, 6:04 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > my response was for Mike and it did NOT inciminate. I do, indeed feel
> >> > > sorry for you.
>
> >> > > You tell ME I don't know how to read documents and attach the correct
> >> > > meaning to the languge used in/by international diplomatic
> >> > > groups......
>
> >> > > It is hilarious... I worked for that body (UN) for 27 years (retired
> >> > > in Oct.) and read/wrote more reports/documents than have have even
> >> > > seen in your life. You ARE funny. They record every conversation in
> >> > > the chamber for just that reason.... meaning is always reverted to the
> >> > > oral explanation when one is formally given as all things do not
> >> > > translate. The quotes ARE empiracal in this matter...
>
> >> > > PLEASE do some homework before trying to stick someone with US style
> >> > > foreign policy understanding. US policy has NO permanent successes in
> >> > > the last 50 years because of its' "me first"  attitude that even the
> >> > > least of you (that would be you) exhibits.
>
> >> > > On 12/26/08, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > Is a mistype now to be seen as a racial slur???   We are
> >> > > > sensitive...   Now if I had engaged in mindless name calling in
> >> > > > posting before, you might have a point...   As I don't and have not,
> >> > > > perhaps this is another case of implication on your part which is not
> >> > > > supported by facts...
>
> >> > > > Now my mother raised me to not just assume the worse in folks...   
> >> > > > The
> >> > > > shame, if any is to be had, is on you for LOOKING for racial slurs or
> >> > > > insults where none were to be had...   You see, I assume we all are
> >> > > > fallible and liable to error and mis-assumption...   So to offset 
> >> > > > that
> >> > > > very human trait, I overlook and forgive others for small stuff
> >> > > > because I know in time I will be the one who mistypes and is
> >> > > > uncivil...
>
> >> > > > I also understand that on the political stage of trash talk, that
> >> > > > position is not favored -- what is favored is an active looking for
> >> > > > insult or slur wither one is intended or not...
>
> >> > > > So I apologize if my typo made you assume it was a slur...  I can see
> >> > > > how it could be...   Please look into your HUMAN and acknowledge your
> >> > > > own human fallibility in finding guilt where there is none...   This
> >> > > > reminds me of the Scarlett Letter and the good projecting Rev...
>
> >> > > > On Dec 26, 4:25 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > It's ok by me Mike. Judaism is passed Maternally. It is indeed my
> >> > > > > mothers side of the family that is Jewish. Racial slurs are spread
> >> > > > > only by those that have fear of those being slurred.
>
> >> > > > > Check ANY racist... the bottom line for his attitude is always 
> >> > > > > fear.
>
> >> > > > > I feel sorry for jgg... nothing more, my mother raised me better,
> >> > > > > obviously his did not.
>
> >> > > > > If, however it is against the rules (or not)... Shame on you JGG, 
> >> > > > > and
> >> > > > > I really mean that.
>
> >> > > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:30 PM, mike [never forget] 532
>
> >> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > be careful JGG i think that might be against the board rules . 
> >> > > > > > you
> >> > > > > > might want to check with WNCS to be sure .
>
> >> > > > > > On Dec 26, 1:52 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> Your are welcome Kike
>
> >> > > > > >> On Dec 26, 12:48 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > >> > Thanks LEW
>
> >> > > > > >> > On 12/26/08, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > >> > > No it was NOT...
>
> >> > > > > >> > > On Dec 26, 9:58 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> > > > You fail to address the point once again Lew.
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > Was the unilateral US action in concert with the UN or 
> >> > > > > >> > > > not ??
>
> >> > > > > >> > > >  It is a simple question.
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > On another level I ask; How can I be a liberal loon or 
> >> > > > > >> > > > qualify for a
> >> > > > > >> > > > US political title when I do not live there ??
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > On 12/26/08, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > >> > > > > Dear
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to