Zeb,

Trust me on the subject. You were a MILE off.

On Jul 13, 12:41 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, I've never been married so I've been spared the claws of
> destruction that some of my friends, and evidently you, have suffered
> courtesy of a vengeful, former "love of my life." It didn't work in my
> story, however, so you had to suspend disbelief there.
>
> On Jul 13, 1:33 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Zeb,
>
> > Duuuuude, this particular guess tells me you know nada about women OR
> > revenge.
>
> > On Jul 13, 12:11 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Hey, I gave it a shot. I had some tight parameters to work with. Only
> > > 53. Enough money to live on till 99. Not allowed to talk about it.
>
> > > How about this one:
>
> > > Holly was a car salesman working in a Mercedes dealership, where he
> > > meets and strikes up a "relationship" with a woman much older than
> > > himself and with some public image. He cons her into thinking he loves
> > > her and they marry, whereupon Holly begins a string of dalliances with
> > > younger attractive women. His "wife" is outraged and in the divorce
> > > agreement, she sets him up for life under the condition that he makes
> > > no disclosures, public or private about their marriage or the
> > > conditions of its dissolution.
>
> > > On Jul 13, 12:57 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Zeb,
>
> > > > It sure does, speculate all you wish.
> > > >  One normally ends up in the truck of a car parked in an alley with an
> > > > ice-pick handle growing out of his ear for doing something like that.
> > > > Of course there IS the witness protection program I hear. Good
> > > > imagination Zeb ol' boy.
>
> > > > On Jul 13, 11:51 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > >I'm legally forbidden to tell ANYONE that story.
>
> > > > > Hmmm...I guess that leaves us to speculate. Lets see....Holly was a
> > > > > mid level distributor of pot operating out of Florida. He makes tons
> > > > > of money and launders it into legal businesses but gets busted. The
> > > > > Feds, however, aren't really interested in taking Holly down, they
> > > > > want the guys above him. Holly gets a good lawyer and the deal is, he
> > > > > gives up his sources, gets out of the business and , here's the good
> > > > > part, gets to keep his ill gotten gains.
>
> > > > > Close?
>
> > > > > On Jul 13, 12:32 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > KIT,
>
> > > > > > Sorry you have to work so hard, sounds like you have been putting 
> > > > > > in a
> > > > > > lot of time.
> > > > > > I know YOUR joking, but there are morons around here that take such
> > > > > > statements to heart. It would tickle you to death to know just how I
> > > > > > made the money that enabled me to retire at age 53 in a position 
> > > > > > where
> > > > > > I will not have to worry about money unless I live past the age of 
> > > > > > 99.
> > > > > > But I'll never tell. Really, I'm legally forbidden to tell ANYONE 
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > story. But it's a great one!
>
> > > > > > On Jul 12, 10:02 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I am literally laughing out loud Holly!!!
>
> > > > > > > Sometimes....You do really tickle me!!!
>
> > > > > > > Some of us have jobs buddy!!!  We all can't go around driving 
> > > > > > > dilapidated
> > > > > > > school buses, toting illegal aliens to the polls now can we?  
> > > > > > > (LOL!  That
> > > > > > > was a joke Holly!!)
>
> > > > > > > In this case, I have been giving literally over a 100 hours a 
> > > > > > > week, for the
> > > > > > > last couple......This week looks to be another ball buster!  
> > > > > > > Nevertheless, I
> > > > > > > will make time to check in on you, FreddieJack, and Young Bruce!!
>
> > > > > > > Have a great week!
>
> > > > > > > Keith
>
> > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Hollywood 
> > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > KIT,
>
> > > > > > > > Why, I wait in breathless anticipation to read your every golden
> > > > > > > > word.  :-)
>
> > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 9:47 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > It's nice to know that I am missed Holly......I haven't been 
> > > > > > > > > active on
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > board, other than this weekend, in almost two weeks.  Glad to 
> > > > > > > > > see that
> > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > noticed.....
>
> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Hollywood 
> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]
> > > > > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > KIT,
>
> > > > > > > > > > Huh? You've been MIA for a couple of weeks? I spoke to you 
> > > > > > > > > > on another
> > > > > > > > > > thread maybe 6  or 7 hours ago. Do you mean MIA in your 
> > > > > > > > > > capacity as a
> > > > > > > > > > moderator, but not as a posting member? Have I been talking 
> > > > > > > > > > to another
> > > > > > > > > > Keith In Tampa?????
> > > > > > > > > > Heck, you posted in this thread today. What gives?
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 6:32 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello Fred, Bruce, Holly, Richard, and all Group Members,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I sincerely apologize, to Mark, to Mystery Moderater No. 
> > > > > > > > > > > 1,
> > > > > > > > > > (affectionately
> > > > > > > > > > > called, "Newie" even though (s)he's been around the block 
> > > > > > > > > > > a few
> > > > > > > > times)
> > > > > > > > > >  but
> > > > > > > > > > > most importantly, to the Group as a whole.  I was missing 
> > > > > > > > > > > in action
> > > > > > > > for a
> > > > > > > > > > > couple of weeks, my schedule was rather hectic, (No.....I 
> > > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > slammed!!)
> > > > > > > > > > > and I literally had no time for moderation, much less 
> > > > > > > > > > > trying to turn
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > light bulb on for Fred/Jack, Sean "SugarShack" Virtual 
> > > > > > > > > > > Truth, Studio,
> > > > > > > > > > > Fritzie, Bill, Biffie, Golem, and all of our friends over 
> > > > > > > > > > > at
> > > > > > > > Euwetopia.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > In a nutshell, Bruce's comments were out of line, as were 
> > > > > > > > > > > several
> > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > > > members.  I don't know who started it;  I point Bruce 
> > > > > > > > > > > out, because it
> > > > > > > > > > seems
> > > > > > > > > > > as though you Fred, are inferring that Young Bruce is 
> > > > > > > > > > > getting some
> > > > > > > > kind
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > special treatment, and that is incorrect.  The bottom 
> > > > > > > > > > > line is, we
> > > > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > > allow for the nasty, vile personal attacks against 
> > > > > > > > > > > another Group
> > > > > > > > Member,
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > I salute Mark for trying to keep a lid on it!
>
> > > > > > > > > > > We have only one rule here in PoliticalForum:  "Govern 
> > > > > > > > > > > Yourself With
> > > > > > > > > > > Dignity, and be respectful of each and every other 
> > > > > > > > > > > Member".   You can
> > > > > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > > > > > this rule, and our guidelines here:
>
> > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum/web/political-forum-dec...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > For the most part, all of us here have known one another 
> > > > > > > > > > > for years.
> > > > > > > >  I am
> > > > > > > > > > > the proverbial "Newbie", being only a member since April 
> > > > > > > > > > > of last
> > > > > > > > year.
> > > > > > > > > > > Everyone seems to get along, and there is no reason for 
> > > > > > > > > > > slinging
> > > > > > > > hateful,
> > > > > > > > > > > nasty barbs and insulting commentary.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > There is a distinction between debate, I dare say even 
> > > > > > > > > > > heated debate,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > just downright offensive name calling and insult 
> > > > > > > > > > > slinging.  We don't
> > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > here, and if that is the only way that you can express 
> > > > > > > > > > > yourself, then
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > strongly suggest that you find another political 
> > > > > > > > > > > discussion board.
> > > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > don't work here.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > The rule goes for everyone, from any political 
> > > > > > > > > > > persuasion, and there
> > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > > > exceptions.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > If someone got their feelings hurt by something said here 
> > > > > > > > > > > during the
> > > > > > > > last
> > > > > > > > > > > couple of weeks, then I take full responsibility.  Again, 
> > > > > > > > > > > I apologize
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > not being around like I was supposed to be.   I have 
> > > > > > > > > > > corrected that
> > > > > > > > > > > problem.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > There is also a distinction between using colorful 
> > > > > > > > > > > metaphors, and
> > > > > > > > > > slinging
> > > > > > > > > > > insulting "nasties" at another member, and we all know 
> > > > > > > > > > > what I am
> > > > > > > > talking
> > > > > > > > > > > about.   By example, Holly on occasion and from time to 
> > > > > > > > > > > time uses
> > > > > > > > the,
> > > > > > > > > > > "Colorful Metaphors".....Holly is not being insulting 
> > > > > > > > > > > when he uses
> > > > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > > > > language, Holly has been doing this ever since I have 
> > > > > > > > > > > been a member
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > PF,
> > > > > > > > > > > and I have no problem with it....As stated, that is the 
> > > > > > > > > > > way that he
> > > > > > > > > > > expresses himself, and his comments are not directed at 
> > > > > > > > > > > any one
> > > > > > > > member to
> > > > > > > > > > > insult them.   Those of you who seem to want to analogize 
> > > > > > > > > > > another
> > > > > > > > Member
> > > > > > > > > > > with a part of either the male, or female anatomy, and/or 
> > > > > > > > > > > make a
> > > > > > > > > > comparison
> > > > > > > > > > > to a Member with human, or any other animal species' body 
> > > > > > > > > > > waste,
> > > > > > > > again,
> > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > is unacceptable.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Again, I apologize for my absence.   I respectfully ask 
> > > > > > > > > > > that everyone
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > respectful of each and every other member,  and if there 
> > > > > > > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > question,
> > > > > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > > if there is anything in this message that you don't 
> > > > > > > > > > > understand, then
> > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > > > means, please feel free to contact me by e-mail.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > KeithInTampa
> > > > > > > > > > > Co-Moderator
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Frederick The Moderate <
>
> > > > > > > > > >  >
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to