Dear plainolamerican:  Sadly, for you the only "real Americans" are
the right-wingers who agree with you.
--
I don't care whether they are left or right, as long as they agree

  As the author of our New
Constitution, I remained as neutral as I could to being labeled one
way or the other.  To get my New Constitution ratified by 75% of the
voters (who vote), both the left and right leaning voters must see
huge advantages for them and their families in having a government
that is answerable to any law-abiding citizen who has a bona fide
complaint.  Instead of dwelling on EMK as the "subject" of this post,
I recommend that you follow the threads to see that right wing issues
like having a smaller and more efficient government with LOWER TAXES
are well under control.  That should make you and your "real
Americans" very happy!  John A. Armistead
---
your left-leaning mentality has been noted

On Sep 20, 8:36 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear plainolamerican:  Sadly, for you the only "real Americans" are
> the right-wingers who agree with you.  As the author of our New
> Constitution, I remained as neutral as I could to being labeled one
> way or the other.  To get my New Constitution ratified by 75% of the
> voters (who vote), both the left and right leaning voters must see
> huge advantages for them and their families in having a government
> that is answerable to any law-abiding citizen who has a bona fide
> complaint.  Instead of dwelling on EMK as the "subject" of this post,
> I recommend that you follow the threads to see that right wing issues
> like having a smaller and more efficient government with LOWER TAXES
> are well under control.  That should make you and your "real
> Americans" very happy!  John A. Armistead
>
> On Sep 19, 11:51 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Apparently, you
> > look subjectively at only the bad side.
> > ---
> > wrong again
> > I look at reality and how he is viewed by real Americans.
>
> >   If others did that to you,
> > how would you fare?
> > ---
> > I haven't made the mistakes that EK has made - so probably well
>
> > On Sep 14, 4:31 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Dear plainolamerican:
>
> > > I look objectively at the good side of human beings.  Apparently, you
> > > look subjectively at only the bad side.  If others did that to you,
> > > how would you fare?  John A. Armistead
>
> > > On Sep 13, 11:33 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > it’s easy for me to state, with conviction,
> > > > that Edward M. Kennedy was probably THE best liked person to have
> > > > ever
> > > > served as a US Senator!
> > > > ----
> > > > it's probably easy for you flap your moonbat wings also, but it will
> > > > never make EMK the best liked person in the senate
>
> > > > some don't forget
>
> > > > On Aug 31, 11:13 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > >      I, like millions of Americans, was glued in front of the TV
> > > > > listening to, and watching, the many tributes to the life and legacy
> > > > > of Edward M. Kennedy, the senior senator from Massachusetts.  I was
> > > > > especially moved by the scene on the Capital steps where many of his
> > > > > former and present staff waited patiently for hours just so they could
> > > > > say a final goodbye.  His wife, Vickie, showed a nobility and a
> > > > > graciousness worthy of her being a First Lady.
> > > > >      By Friday night it was probably obvious to most viewers that they
> > > > > themselves—at least for a while—had been witnesses to Teddy Kennedy’s
> > > > > life of public service.  Such had been so exceptional as to call forth
> > > > > glowing tribute after tribute, often highlighting Kennedy’s honesty
> > > > > and his big heart—in both his personal and professional lives.
> > > > > Because the sentiments of admiration and thanks to Teddy Kennedy were
> > > > > so National in scope, it’s easy to understand why those people who
> > > > > could, decided to line the route from Washington, DC to Arlington
> > > > > National Cemetery so that they, too, could pay personal tributes to
> > > > > that exceptional man.  Once I realized the length and breadth of the
> > > > > appreciation for Teddy, it’s easy for me to state, with conviction,
> > > > > that Edward M. Kennedy was probably THE best liked person to have ever
> > > > > served as a US Senator!
> > > > >      It was oft-repeated that Teddy had been a senator for nearly 47
> > > > > years.  He was the third longest serving senator behind J. Strom
> > > > > Thurmond of South Carolina, and Robert C. Bird of West Virginia.
> > > > > Bird, age 92 and looking frail, was waiting at the Capital steps in a
> > > > > wheelchair to bid goodbye to his friend and colleague, Teddy.
> > > > > However, the glories of those friendships can’t negate the collective
> > > > > damaging effects that the US Senate has had on this country from day
> > > > > one.  The anti-democracy senate never should have been brought into
> > > > > existence, nor allowed to continue to exist, when our Constitution has
> > > > > as its founding spirit: “The supremacy of democracy and fair play.”
> > > > >      The three gravest errors by the Founding Fathers in writing the
> > > > > Constitution were: (1.)  Having a US Senate at all;  (2.)  Their
> > > > > making the impeachment process so complicated as to be practically
> > > > > useless; and (3.)  Their making the processes for amending the
> > > > > Constitution too restrictive to have allowed such to correct, early
> > > > > on, some of its fundamental flaws.
> > > > >      All of his life, Teddy Kennedy enjoyed the sport of sailing.
> > > > > During one of Friday’s tributes, it was humorously related how Kennedy
> > > > > had also liked to race.  Win or loose, he was a game-player.  In the
> > > > > Senate he lost more than he won.  But he was good natured about
> > > > > either.  Probably, more than any other person, Teddy had the
> > > > > personality and the temperament to be outstanding in the Senate.
> > > > > Caroline Kennedy, on the other hand, was more of a shy introvert.  She
> > > > > lacked her uncle’s love of person-to-person contacts and didn’t have
> > > > > the wrangling spirit that’s so necessary to be an ‘effective’ Senator.
> > > > >      Where she not Secretary of State, former senator Hillary Rodham
> > > > > Clinton has been mentioned as a strong-personality, consensus-builder
> > > > > type who might could have filled Teddy’s shoes—figuratively, of
> > > > > course.  For far too long, their has been this notion that electing
> > > > > strong and powerful representatives and senators is what people need
> > > > > to do.  That erroneous notion, unneeded in a democracy, has kept-in-
> > > > > place the anti-democracy ‘seniority’ system.  Since those with prior
> > > > > governmental experience seem better equipped to go to Washington and
> > > > > FIGHT for the voters, this country is largely “represented” by CAREER
> > > > > politicians, who are out-of-touch with the common man.
> > > > >      There are a dozen or so US Senators whom any person would feel
> > > > > privileged to know.  Republican Orrin Hatch is certainly one.  He’s
> > > > > also serious-minded enough that his political ideas should be valued,
> > > > > highly.  In contrast with Kennedy, Hatch admitted having had a modest
> > > > > background.  He graduated from the ‘Harvard of the West,’ Brigham
> > > > > Young University.
> > > > >      Senator Robert C. Byrd, already mentioned, was an entertaining,
> > > > > perhaps hypnotic presence who knew when to pull out his fiddle, or to
> > > > > dance a jig, to keep himself getting re elected.  He was notorious in
> > > > > how he could get earmarks and grants for pet projects for his state.
> > > > > And he was notorious for wielding more… ‘power’ than even the
> > > > > Constitution ever intended for a single senator to get.  Though he
> > > > > knew how to entertain and could wow others with his speeches, Byrd was
> > > > > a negative influence on this country, as a whole, though he’s probably
> > > > > not thought of that way in West Virginia.
> > > > >      SC Senator J. Strom Thurmond—from my home state—died in 2003.
> > > > > Quite candidly, he was a bombastic simpleton, nothing more.  He fought
> > > > > for legislation, sometimes literally.  His media prominence and
> > > > > constituent services kept him in office till age 100.  Though he had
> > > > > often touted the virtues of honesty and integrity, he lacked both of
> > > > > those qualities.  And he lacked a conscience as well.  Strom fathered
> > > > > at least five bastard children.  His ‘brain’ was located closer to his
> > > > > loins than beneath his orange color hair.  Sadly, his children value
> > > > > their family name more than they value honesty.
> > > > >      Teddy Kennedy had his ’Joan’, while Strom had his ‘Nancy’… by-
> > > > > hook-or-by-crook.  To date, history book writers have been too
> > > > > impotent to reveal that man’s true nature.  Though he has a bigger-
> > > > > than-life bronze statue in Columbia showing him walking—briefcase in
> > > > > hand—Thurmond’s greatest legacy will be that HE is the primary motive
> > > > > for my having written and polished the New Constitution of the United
> > > > > States of America.  The insights that I gained regarding our failed
> > > > > and failing State and Federal Governments is the direct result of my
> > > > > having gone head-to-head with the senator.  While he lived, I lost…
> > > > > But when a true history of that man is written, there won’t be many
> > > > > South Carolinians who will be proud to have a bronze stature(s) on
> > > > > public property legitimizing that scoundrel.
> > > > >      Because of his advanced age, Thurmond didn’t seek re election.
> > > > > Instead, he chose to… ‘endorse’ the present scoundrel, Senator Lindsey
> > > > > Graham.  The following excerpts from my New Constitution relate to
> > > > > political endorsements:
>
> > > > > … “It shall be a felony for any government official or employee, or
> > > > > any celebrity or media idol—past or present—to publicly endorse or
> > > > > campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office or job.
> > > > > Exhibiting ideological bias in a job terminates the employment.
> > > > > Candidates for public office shall be disqualified for soliciting new
> > > > > voter registrants; and no campaign shall aid or organize the
> > > > > transportation of voters to the polls.”
>
> > > > >      I realized that there was a fishiness to Graham when I got a
> > > > > unisex letter from him signed: “Lin.”  Like a Jack-in-a-Box, Graham is
> > > > > always popping up in front of the media.  Several of Judge Sonia
> > > > > Sotomayor’s speeches, apparently, had troubled Graham.  But
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to