Last night I happened to watch a History Channel show about the influence of the Free Masonry Lodges in America. ---- this admission doesn't help your credibility
A very old document, perhaps based on ideas that had been kept in the Arc of the Covenant, was shown. A highlighted sentence said that "... individual rights and democracy should exceed group rights and influences." ---- what would you expect from jews? “Principles of democracy and fair play shall reign supreme in the USA.” ---- says the democrat I highly recommend that no person seek public office who cannot live and breathe that one sentence. Barack Obama has done just that. --- opinion noted - not shared That’s why Obama is the anti-Christ, ---- he prays with the jews Being suave and… ‘cool under fire’ can’t negate his being corrupt to-the-core. ---- he has help from his COS On Sep 28, 11:01 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear plainolamerican: Last night I happened to watch a History > Channel show about the influence of the Free Masonry Lodges in > America. A very old document, perhaps based on ideas that had been > kept in the Arc of the Covenant, was shown. A highlighted sentence > said that "... individual rights and democracy should exceed group > rights and influences." Based on my own observations over a lifetime, > I conclude that ‘group’ objectives, inevitably, are biased toward each > particular group. Groups try to get more power and influence than the > physical numbers of the members should justify. And THAT notion runs > diametrically counter to having a fair democracy! > > The original Constitution makes no mention of having pseudo-political > groups, called parties, act as clearing houses for selecting who among > us can seek public office. The underlying objective of our > Constitution was to have FAIR treatment of individuals, and to have > those individuals control government, rather than vice versa. Letting > just two political parties have widely spaced primaries, gives much > greater power to those voting in the early primaries. Barack Obama, > counter to principles of fair play, started claiming… ‘victory’ almost > from the outset. The effect was to stampede the undecided voters to > him. And when the… liberal media echoed his likely win—hours per day— > that Manchurian Candidate, Obama, didn’t have the decency to demand > that the media stop showing their favoritism. That’s why he will be > facing TREASON charges when my New Constitution is ratified. > > I sense that you are a very unhappy person. Your group-against-group > hatreds run deep. Our two, divisive, political parties could not > possibly reflect the ideology of each of their members. Rather, > voters must pick and choose the party ‘closest’ to their personal > philosophies. And then they must defer the achieving of those > “approximate” objectives to the supposed ‘powerful’ political bosses > in Washington. > > If the USA is ever going to prosper, no group, lobby, nor political > influence shall be allowed to dilute the following one sentence on > which both the original Constitution and my New Constitution are > based: “Principles of democracy and fair play shall reign supreme in > the USA.” I highly recommend that no person seek public office who > cannot live and breathe that one sentence. Barack Obama has done just > that. That’s why Obama is the anti-Christ, and public/world enemy > #1. Being suave and… ‘cool under fire’ can’t negate his being corrupt > to-the-core. And Chicago—in the likely most corrupt state in the USA— > doesn’t deserve to host the Olympics. Games of any kind produce > mostly losers. But fair democracies produce mostly winners! > > John A. Armistead > > > > On Sep 27, 2:20 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > NOTE: Under my New Constitution > > it will be illegal for the media or celebrities, etc. to 'label' > > anyone... "left wing; liberal; right wing; or conservative." > > ---- > > your desire to censor Americans and 1st ammendment has been noted > > > If this > > country is to long survive, we must stop splitting the country... > > "down-the-aisle"! > > --- > > I agree. It's time the vaporize dems and repubs who have proven to be > > corrupt > > > In all group-against-group fights there are about > > 50% losers. However, we can all win by considering that each > > person's > > vote, when tallied—in our first ever democracy > > ---- > > democracy is for losers > > > (on demand)—will better > > express the Will of the People, > > ---- > > which people - the losers/minorities? > > > than can any party platform. Your problem is: You don't have any > > love in your heart. Hatred will take > > you to your early grave. John A. Armistead > > ---- > > so, it's love that you want, eh? > > get jesus > > > On Sep 21, 4:23 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear plainolamerican: You call anything 'left' of the radical > > > right... "left wing". Like I've said, I am a centrist. I see and > > > value the "arguments" on both sides. NOTE: Under my New Constitution > > > it will be illegal for the media or celebrities, etc. to 'label' > > > anyone... "left wing; liberal; right wing; or conservative." If this > > > country is to long survive, we must stop splitting the country... > > > "down-the-aisle"! In all group-against-group fights there are about > > > 50% losers. However, we can all win by considering that each person's > > > vote, when tallied—in our first ever democracy (on demand)—will better > > > express the Will of the People, than can any party platform. Your > > > problem is: You don't have any love in your heart. Hatred will take > > > you to your early grave. John A. Armistead > > > > On Sep 20, 11:03 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear plainolamerican: Sadly, for you the only "real Americans" are > > > > the right-wingers who agree with you. > > > > -- > > > > I don't care whether they are left or right, as long as they agree > > > > > As the author of our New > > > > Constitution, I remained as neutral as I could to being labeled one > > > > way or the other. To get my New Constitution ratified by 75% of the > > > > voters (who vote), both the left and right leaning voters must see > > > > huge advantages for them and their families in having a government > > > > that is answerable to any law-abiding citizen who has a bona fide > > > > complaint. Instead of dwelling on EMK as the "subject" of this post, > > > > I recommend that you follow the threads to see that right wing issues > > > > like having a smaller and more efficient government with LOWER TAXES > > > > are well under control. That should make you and your "real > > > > Americans" very happy! John A. Armistead > > > > --- > > > > your left-leaning mentality has been noted > > > > > On Sep 20, 8:36 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Dear plainolamerican: Sadly, for you the only "real Americans" are > > > > > the right-wingers who agree with you. As the author of our New > > > > > Constitution, I remained as neutral as I could to being labeled one > > > > > way or the other. To get my New Constitution ratified by 75% of the > > > > > voters (who vote), both the left and right leaning voters must see > > > > > huge advantages for them and their families in having a government > > > > > that is answerable to any law-abiding citizen who has a bona fide > > > > > complaint. Instead of dwelling on EMK as the "subject" of this post, > > > > > I recommend that you follow the threads to see that right wing issues > > > > > like having a smaller and more efficient government with LOWER TAXES > > > > > are well under control. That should make you and your "real > > > > > Americans" very happy! John A. Armistead > > > > > > On Sep 19, 11:51 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Apparently, you > > > > > > look subjectively at only the bad side. > > > > > > --- > > > > > > wrong again > > > > > > I look at reality and how he is viewed by real Americans. > > > > > > > If others did that to you, > > > > > > how would you fare? > > > > > > --- > > > > > > I haven't made the mistakes that EK has made - so probably well > > > > > > > On Sep 14, 4:31 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear plainolamerican: > > > > > > > > I look objectively at the good side of human beings. Apparently, > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > look subjectively at only the bad side. If others did that to > > > > > > > you, > > > > > > > how would you fare? John A. Armistead > > > > > > > > On Sep 13, 11:33 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > it’s easy for me to state, with conviction, > > > > > > > > that Edward M. Kennedy was probably THE best liked person to > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > ever > > > > > > > > served as a US Senator! > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > it's probably easy for you flap your moonbat wings also, but it > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > never make EMK the best liked person in the senate > > > > > > > > > some don't forget > > > > > > > > > On Aug 31, 11:13 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I, like millions of Americans, was glued in front of the > > > > > > > > > TV > > > > > > > > > listening to, and watching, the many tributes to the life and > > > > > > > > > legacy > > > > > > > > > of Edward M. Kennedy, the senior senator from Massachusetts. > > > > > > > > > I was > > > > > > > > > especially moved by the scene on the Capital steps where many > > > > > > > > > of his > > > > > > > > > former and present staff waited patiently for hours just so > > > > > > > > > they could > > > > > > > > > say a final goodbye. His wife, Vickie, showed a nobility and > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > graciousness worthy of her being a First Lady. > > > > > > > > > By Friday night it was probably obvious to most viewers > > > > > > > > > that they > > > > > > > > > themselves—at least for a while—had been witnesses to Teddy > > > > > > > > > Kennedy’s > > > > > > > > > life of public service. Such had been so exceptional as to > > > > > > > > > call forth > > > > > > > > > glowing tribute after tribute, often highlighting Kennedy’s > > > > > > > > > honesty > > > > > > > > > and his big heart—in both his personal and professional lives. > > > > > > > > > Because the sentiments of admiration and thanks to Teddy > > > > > > > > > Kennedy were > > > > > > > > > so National in scope, it’s easy to understand why those > > > > > > > > > people who > > > > > > > > > could, decided to line the route from Washington, DC to > > > > > > > > > Arlington > > > > > > > > > National Cemetery so that they, too, could pay personal > > > > > > > > > tributes to > > > > > > > > > that exceptional man. Once I realized the length and breadth > > > > > > > > > of the > > > > > > > > > appreciation for Teddy, it’s easy for me to state, with > > > > > > > > > conviction, > > > > > > > > > that Edward M. Kennedy was probably THE best liked person to > > > > > > > > > have ever > > > > > > > > > served as a US Senator! > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
