Fairness principles are innate to everyone with a conscious. Disputed cases can be decided by trial. But there will be no person or governing body that must pass of what is fair. If you don't understand that fact, then you don't have a conscious. ---- good observation is a conscious mandatory in your New America?
btw - you didn't answer my questions On Nov 1, 3:51 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear plainolamerican: I already know that you enjoy having your pet > hatrids. As an individual, you are entitled to 'feel' any way your > wish. That same principle applies to every single law-abiding > American. The meeting-point of such diverse Americans is the > commonality of basic needs like having and keeping a dependable job, > and being given a reasonable lattitude of personal liberties—without > "others" trying to control how you should live, In a way, that's like > saying "Live and let live.” The early pioneers simply desired the > right to control their own destiny. They trusted that their native > work ethic would provide. They tended to distance themselves from > governmental processes, beyond voting for a suited representative. > The law soon gave protections of their property rights, so that > claimed land couldn't be stolen. What a person earned by his own > labors was defensible property. Only in the last century has > government become the "crook" who could take away the fruits of your > labors without retribution. "Taxation without representation (still) > is treason." > > ALL group-against-group biases are unfair! If a group feels oppressed > it will wish to... even-the-score by gaining an authority greater than > would be allocated based on the number of group members. The shallow- > minded Democrats, having won the Presidency and controlling both > houses of Congress, feel justified in exploiting the vanquished > (Republicans) to reward the have-not Democrats. Suddenly, in America > it has become a crime to become a successful business person. If > there are a million lazy Democrats wanting some handout, they see no > problem in STEALING from the rich to give to the poor. But is that > "fair"? Hell no! Having one's property seized by government is the > exact type crime that caused the pioneers to come to America in order > to escape. Where have we gone wrong? > > Fairness principles are innate to everyone with a conscious. Disputed > cases can be decided by trial. But there will be no person or > governing body that must pass of what is fair. If you don't > understand that fact, then you don't have a conscious. > > Congress, as presently constituted, is composed predominantly of > egotistical career politicians who got elected in order to be a member > of the "ruling class". But the Founding Fathers wished for government > to be our servant, NOT our taskmaster! Doing away with political > parties, and outlawing lobbying of any kind suddenly will make the > influence of individual Americans greater. Democracy can decide > controversial issues fairly while bypassing the for-show battles > between the political parties. Those elected to public office must be > motivated not for ego or status, but to improve the living and working > conditions in America. The Capital will be off-limits to the media of > any kind, and to all public visits except guided tours that prohibit > having one-on-one contact with any representative. When > representatives come to work, they don't need to wear suits and ties— > because no one will be taking their photos. The ego factor will at > long last have been removed from serving in Washington. > > I'm pleased that you, also, dislike allowing political labeling. > America will have become just 'Americans' without other labels being > attached. People should stop allowing group leaders to speak on their > behalf. In a thousand ways, every American will get to have their own > say! — John A. Armistead — > > > > On Oct 31, 9:02 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If any 'group' in America gets an unfair > > advantage, my New Constitution will even the playing field. > > --- > > who gets to decide what's unfair? > > > A person's representative will be enjoined, by my Constitution, from > > listening to the wishes of any persons other than their constituents. > > --- > > good > > > And the US Capital will be closed to all outsiders except for those > > on > > guided tours, or representatives of the President > > --- > > including AIPAC? > > > It shall be a > > felony for any group or special interest to lobby members of the > > House. And also a felony for special interests to contact any > > representative other than their one rep. from their home district. > > Similarly, it is a felony for any 'big wig' to contact a > > representative under the auspices of acting on behalf of a particular > > group or organization. In short: All law abiding individuals are > > empowered, fairly as individuals. But all group-against-group routes > > to supposed power will be disallowed from ever again acting as > > intermediaries between the People and their government. Most > > conspicuous in this regard is the outlawing of political parties, and > > making it a civil offense to pigeon hole any person as: left or > > right; > > liberal or conservative. Note: To allow the latter labeling would > > have the effect of letting this country continue to be… “split-down- > > the-aisle”. Political parties are out, as is divisive labeling > > regarding one’s political ideology. — John A. Armistead > > ---- > > ah, an ally!!! > > > On Oct 7, 5:42 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear plainolamerican: If any 'group' in America gets an unfair > > > advantage, my New Constitution will even the playing field. A > > > person's representative will be enjoined, by my Constitution, from > > > listening to the wishes of any persons other than their constituents. > > > And the US Capital will be closed to all outsiders except for those on > > > guided tours, or representatives of the President. It shall be a > > > felony for any group or special interest to lobby members of the > > > House. And also a felony for special interests to contact any > > > representative other than their one rep. from their home district. > > > Similarly, it is a felony for any 'big wig' to contact a > > > representative under the auspices of acting on behalf of a particular > > > group or organization. In short: All law abiding individuals are > > > empowered, fairly as individuals. But all group-against-group routes > > > to supposed power will be disallowed from ever again acting as > > > intermediaries between the People and their government. Most > > > conspicuous in this regard is the outlawing of political parties, and > > > making it a civil offense to pigeon hole any person as: left or right; > > > liberal or conservative. Note: To allow the latter labeling would > > > have the effect of letting this country continue to be… “split-down- > > > the-aisle”. Political parties are out, as is divisive labeling > > > regarding one’s political ideology. — John A. Armistead — > > > > On Oct 2, 2:27 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately, your "joy" in life centers on hating others. > > > > --- > > > > bs > > > > it's not about hate - it's about preserving and protecting the USA > > > > from socialists/communists > > > > > Except for > > > > the 'separated and thus suspicious culture' and the 'you-owe-me-one' > > > > chip on their shoulders (because of the Holocaust), Jews are largely > > > > likable and reasonable people. They easily coexist as long as others > > > > respect them and give them their space. > > > > --- > > > > history say otherwise > > > > they are race baiters and use our government for the advantage of > > > > Israel and always will > > > > > do you know that the US has imprisoned or deported more Israelis/jews > > > > for spying than any other? > > > > >http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache%3AcD5_8PWlBikJ%3Awhiterevolu... > > > > > On Oct 2, 10:52 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Dear plainolamerican: Unlike you, I don't close my mind to widening > > > > > my knowledge simply because of biases. In my opinion the two most > > > > > hurtful vices are: dishonesty and bias. I may not agree with > > > > > everything I hear or read, but at least I listen to the arguments! > > > > > > Unfortunately, your "joy" in life centers on hating others. Except for > > > > > the 'separated and thus suspicious culture' and the 'you-owe-me-one' > > > > > chip on their shoulders (because of the Holocaust), Jews are largely > > > > > likable and reasonable people. They easily coexist as long as others > > > > > respect them and give them their space. > > > > > > I suspect that one reason more readers of this post (other than you) > > > > > haven't offered comments is because they know I will defend my > > > > > position. Those who agree with me let... silence be their vote. > > > > > Probably, those who disagree don't have my past commitment in time > > > > > spent considering the issues to bolster their positions. So, perhaps… > > > > > silence is golden. — John A. Armistead — > > > > > > On Sep 30, 9:12 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Last night I happened to watch a History > > > > > > Channel show about the influence of the Free Masonry Lodges in > > > > > > America. > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > this admission doesn't help your credibility > > > > > > > A very old document, perhaps based on ideas that had been > > > > > > kept in the Arc of the Covenant, was shown. A highlighted sentence > > > > > > said that "... individual rights and democracy should exceed group > > > > > > rights and influences." > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > what would you expect from jews? > > > > > > > “Principles of democracy and fair play shall reign supreme in > > > > > > the USA.” > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > says the democrat > > > > > > > I highly recommend that no person seek public office who > > > > > > cannot live and breathe that one sentence. Barack Obama has done > > > > > > just > > > > > > that. > > > > > > --- > > > > > > opinion noted - not shared > > > > > > > That’s why Obama is the anti-Christ, > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > he prays with the jews > > > > > > > Being suave- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
