poor little moron you think that the fact that your racist failing bumbling leaders are dropping out and dropping in the polls is OK as long as Republicans aren't popular either
a very revealing confession on your part my little stalinoid fart On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, VT Sean Lewis <[email protected]>wrote: > which polls are you talking about? > > They must not include Republican poll numbers, > > > On Jan 11, 10:32 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > polls would indicate that know one takes you or your leader or your media > > seriously > > > > you are ticks and it is time for you to be picked off and burnt > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:28 AM, VT Sean Lewis > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Oh Please, you fools are reaching and making fools of yourselves. > > > No one takes these crazy fringe nuts seriously, but you keep it > > > up, makes the 9/11 conspirators look sane. > > > > > On Jan 11, 9:52 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Let’s not Forget: Bill Clinton was the first “Birther” > > > > ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA, AUGUST 4TH, 2008, QUESTIONED OBAMA'S > > > ELIGIBILITY*by > > > > John Charlton* > > > > > > (Jan. 11, 2010) — Let's not forget that the first "Birther" of note, > was > > > > Bill Clinton. "Birther" is the derogatory appellation used by Obama > > > > supporters to ridicule those who ask why Obama won't show his birth > > > > certificate. > > > > > > Late last night, The Post & Email published the results of recent > > > > investigation < > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/10/red-flags-overlooked/> of > > > > the issue, by a citizen journalist, which explain that the Hawaii > > > Department > > > > of Health knows Obama's alleged birth certificate (displayed on the > > > Internet > > > > as an electronic image of a Certification of Live Birth) is a > forgery. > > > > > > In this context, it should be noted that Bill Clinton was apparently > > > aware > > > > of the forgery as early as Obama's birthday in 2008. > > > > He made these comments on Good Morning America. You can view the > > > > video here< > > >http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/an-insightful-note-from-a.. > .> > > > > . > > > > > > The comment was mentioned by the Associated Press, in an unsigned > > > > report< > > >http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-04-clinton.. > .> > > > > filed > > > > the same day: > > > > > > "I never was mad at Sen. Obama," the former president said. "I think > > > > everybody's got a right to run for president who qualifies under the > > > > Constitution. And I'd be the last person to begrudge anybody their > > > > ambition." > > > > > > Evidently no one at the AP was willing to take the heat for even > > > repeating > > > > the comment. But one political scientist > > > > explained< > > >http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/an-insightful-note-from-a.. > .> > > > > what > > > > Clinton meant by his statement: > > > > > > If you notice, at the beginning of the video, Bill makes a comment > about > > > > Obama being held to a different standard than others who have run for > > > > president, but he also said (around the 44 second mark): “That > everybody > > > has > > > > a right to run for president *as long as they’re qualified under the > > > > Constitution*” (emphasis mine). > > > > > > Here’s the thing – I have followed Bill’s political career for a long > > > time > > > > (and I have studied it closely because I am a political scientist) > and > > > *he > > > > did NOT say this accidentally. This is a message to TexasDarlin’ (I > am > > > sure > > > > he knows all about her posts and her reports) to keep pressing in on > the > > > > citizenship/birth certificate issue.* > > > > > > NOTE: That is NOT what Bill Clinton said. We’re just reading between > the > > > > lines, perhaps hopefully. > > > > > > Though I can probably never prove this (and Bill would likely deny > it, if > > > he > > > > were ever confronted with it), I know that Bill was trying to say – > “keep > > > > going!” > > > > > > TexasDarlin was a blog from Texas, published by a female supporter of > > > > Hillary Clinton. The blog has been temporarily revived on the > Internet in > > > > support of Scott Brown's candidacy; however, the blog posts no longer > > > exists > > > > on the web. > > > > > > In response to Clinton's comment, the obvious conclusion was being > drawn > > > > within hours of Clinton's comment: "Is Obama qualified under the > > > > constitution?", asked JohnF, a platinum member, at > > > > CommonGroundsPolitics.net< > > >http://www.commongroundpolitics.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=22378>, > > > > at 3 PM that afternoon. > > > > > > The qualifications required by a presidential Candidate are stated in > > > > the original > > > > text< > > >http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html> > of > > > > the U.S. Constitution, in Article II, section i, clause 5: > > > > > > No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United > > > States, > > > > at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible > to > > > the > > > > Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that > Office > > > who > > > > shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been > > > fourteen > > > > Years a Resident within the United States. > > > > > > Certainly Bill Clinton was not disputing that Obama was at least 35 > years > > > > old! > > > > > > And certainly he was not disputing that Obama had been a resident of > the > > > > United States since 1994! > > > > > > So the only thing left, is the natural born citizenship issue. And > that > > > > would mean that Clinton was reminding us that to be a natural born > > > citizen > > > > one must be born > > > > > > 1) On U.S. soil > > > > > > 2) of a father who is a U.S. Citizen, and > > > > > > 3) of a mother who is a U.S. Citizen, > > > > > > 4) each of which 3 criteria must be true at the moment of birth > > > > > > For more information about the natural born citizenship requirement, > see > > > The > > > > Post & Email's article on the 4 Supreme Court > > > > Cases< > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-n.. > .> > > > > which > > > > have defined what this term means, following what Emmerich de Vattel > > > wrote > > > > in his treatise, The Law of Nations. > > > > > > Few dispute that Obama's mother was not a U.S. Citizen. Though there > is > > > > speculation< > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/05/who%e2%80%99s-your-daddy-who%e.. > > > .>about > > > > who she was, especially among Hillary supporters. > > > > > > Few doubt that Obama's father was Barack Obama Senior, a British > subject; > > > > and it has been conclusively > > > > shown< > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/british-law-declares-obama-a-b.. > .> > > > > that > > > > if Obama's birth story is true, that he is presently a British > subject, > > > > still. > > > > > > And many wonder if Obama was in fact born in Kenya, especially after > > > > an eye-witness > > > > says< > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/03/obama-in-1980-said-he-was-born.. > .> > > > > that > > > > is what Obama claimed in 1980. > > > > > > The disclosure of Obama's original vital > > > > records< > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/04/hawaii-petition-campaign-launc.. > .> > > > > will > > > > alone settle these doubts and clarify for all time, the issue of > Obama's > > > > eligibility. The question is, "where are they being kept?", and that > > > > depends on where he was born. > > > > > > © 2010, The Post & Email <http://www.thepostemail.com/>. All rights > > > reserved > > > > internationally, unless otherwise specified. > > > > > -- > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
