who Clinton? what are you babbling about moron?
it's Bill Clinton talking about Obama you are really too stupid to post things on the internet On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:37 PM, VT Sean Lewis <[email protected]>wrote: > This from the experts who had the Republicans winning in 2006 and > 2008. > > On Jan 11, 1:10 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > Your points are silly > > > > No Demwit flak anywhere thinks the demwits are going to gain seats > overall > > > > You are just a flatulent braying jackass as always spinning for your > fascist > > overlords > > > > You will both meet justice soon > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:45 AM, VT Sean Lewis > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > No I just pointed out an obvious point you always seem to ignore. > > > > > And more Republicans are dropping out the Democrats, > > > another point you seem to forget > > > > > Also a poorly worded comment is no where in the same > > > category as Obama the magic negro > > > > > On Jan 11, 10:39 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > poor little moron > > > > > > you think that the fact that your racist failing bumbling leaders are > > > > dropping out and dropping in the polls is OK as long as Republicans > > > aren't > > > > popular either > > > > > > a very revealing confession on your part my little stalinoid fart > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, VT Sean Lewis > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > which polls are you talking about? > > > > > > > They must not include Republican poll numbers, > > > > > > > On Jan 11, 10:32 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > polls would indicate that know one takes you or your leader or > your > > > media > > > > > > seriously > > > > > > > > you are ticks and it is time for you to be picked off and burnt > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:28 AM, VT Sean Lewis > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Oh Please, you fools are reaching and making fools of > yourselves. > > > > > > > No one takes these crazy fringe nuts seriously, but you keep it > > > > > > > up, makes the 9/11 conspirators look sane. > > > > > > > > > On Jan 11, 9:52 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Let’s not Forget: Bill Clinton was the first “Birther” > > > > > > > > ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA, AUGUST 4TH, 2008, QUESTIONED OBAMA'S > > > > > > > ELIGIBILITY*by > > > > > > > > John Charlton* > > > > > > > > > > (Jan. 11, 2010) — Let's not forget that the first "Birther" > of > > > note, > > > > > was > > > > > > > > Bill Clinton. "Birther" is the derogatory appellation used > by > > > Obama > > > > > > > > supporters to ridicule those who ask why Obama won't show his > > > birth > > > > > > > > certificate. > > > > > > > > > > Late last night, The Post & Email published the results of > recent > > > > > > > > investigation < > > > > > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/10/red-flags-overlooked/> > of > > > > > > > > the issue, by a citizen journalist, which explain that the > Hawaii > > > > > > > Department > > > > > > > > of Health knows Obama's alleged birth certificate (displayed > on > > > the > > > > > > > Internet > > > > > > > > as an electronic image of a Certification of Live Birth) is a > > > > > forgery. > > > > > > > > > > In this context, it should be noted that Bill Clinton was > > > apparently > > > > > > > aware > > > > > > > > of the forgery as early as Obama's birthday in 2008. > > > > > > > > He made these comments on Good Morning America. You can view > the > > > > > > > > video here< > > > > >http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/an-insightful-note-from-a.. > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > The comment was mentioned by the Associated Press, in an > unsigned > > > > > > > > report< > > > > >http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-04-clinton.. > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > filed > > > > > > > > the same day: > > > > > > > > > > "I never was mad at Sen. Obama," the former president said. > "I > > > think > > > > > > > > everybody's got a right to run for president who qualifies > under > > > the > > > > > > > > Constitution. And I'd be the last person to begrudge anybody > > > their > > > > > > > > ambition." > > > > > > > > > > Evidently no one at the AP was willing to take the heat for > even > > > > > > > repeating > > > > > > > > the comment. But one political scientist > > > > > > > > explained< > > > > >http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/an-insightful-note-from-a.. > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > Clinton meant by his statement: > > > > > > > > > > If you notice, at the beginning of the video, Bill makes a > > > comment > > > > > about > > > > > > > > Obama being held to a different standard than others who have > run > > > for > > > > > > > > president, but he also said (around the 44 second mark): > “That > > > > > everybody > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > a right to run for president *as long as they’re qualified > under > > > the > > > > > > > > Constitution*” (emphasis mine). > > > > > > > > > > Here’s the thing – I have followed Bill’s political career > for a > > > long > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > (and I have studied it closely because I am a political > > > scientist) > > > > > and > > > > > > > *he > > > > > > > > did NOT say this accidentally. This is a message to > TexasDarlin’ > > > (I > > > > > am > > > > > > > sure > > > > > > > > he knows all about her posts and her reports) to keep > pressing in > > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > > > citizenship/birth certificate issue.* > > > > > > > > > > NOTE: That is NOT what Bill Clinton said. We’re just reading > > > between > > > > > the > > > > > > > > lines, perhaps hopefully. > > > > > > > > > > Though I can probably never prove this (and Bill would likely > > > deny > > > > > it, if > > > > > > > he > > > > > > > > were ever confronted with it), I know that Bill was trying to > say > > > – > > > > > “keep > > > > > > > > going!” > > > > > > > > > > TexasDarlin was a blog from Texas, published by a female > > > supporter of > > > > > > > > Hillary Clinton. The blog has been temporarily revived on the > > > > > Internet in > > > > > > > > support of Scott Brown's candidacy; however, the blog posts > no > > > longer > > > > > > > exists > > > > > > > > on the web. > > > > > > > > > > In response to Clinton's comment, the obvious conclusion was > > > being > > > > > drawn > > > > > > > > within hours of Clinton's comment: "Is Obama qualified under > the > > > > > > > > constitution?", asked JohnF, a platinum member, at > > > > > > > > CommonGroundsPolitics.net< > > > > >http://www.commongroundpolitics.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=22378>, > > > > > > > > at 3 PM that afternoon. > > > > > > > > > > The qualifications required by a presidential Candidate are > > > stated in > > > > > > > > the original > > > > > > > > text< > > > > >http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html> > > > > > of > > > > > > > > the U.S. Constitution, in Article II, section i, clause 5: > > > > > > > > > > No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the > > > United > > > > > > > States, > > > > > > > > at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be > > > eligible > > > > > to > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to > that > > > > > Office > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and > been > > > > > > > fourteen > > > > > > > > Years a Resident within the United States. > > > > > > > > > > Certainly Bill Clinton was not disputing that Obama was at > least > > > 35 > > > > > years > > > > > > > > old! > > > > > > > > > > And certainly he was not disputing that Obama had been a > resident > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > > United States since 1994! > > > > > > > > > > So the only thing left, is the natural born citizenship > issue. > > > And > > > > > that > > > > > > > > would mean that Clinton was reminding us that to be a natural > > > born > > > > > > > citizen > > > > > > > > one must be born > > > > > > > > > > 1) On U.S. soil > > > > > > > > > > 2) of a father who is a U.S. Citizen, and > > > > > > > > > > 3) of a mother who is a U.S. Citizen, > > > > > > > > > > 4) each of which 3 criteria must be true at the moment of > birth > > > > > > > > > > For more information about the natural born citizenship > > > requirement, > > > > > see > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > Post & Email's article on the 4 Supreme Court > > > > > > > > Cases< > > > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-n.. > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > have defined what this term means, following what Emmerich de > > > Vattel > > > > > > > wrote > > > > > > > > in his treatise, The Law of Nations. > > > > > > > > > > Few dispute that Obama's mother was not a U.S. Citizen. > Though > > > there > > > > > is > > > > > > > > speculation< > > > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/05/who%e2%80%99s-your-daddy-who%e.. > > > > > > > .>about > > > > > > > > who she was, especially among Hillary supporters. > > > > > > > > > > Few doubt that Obama's father was Barack Obama Senior, a > British > > > > > subject; > > > > > > > > and it has been conclusively > > > > > > > > shown< > > > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/british-law-declares-obama-a-b.. > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > if Obama's birth story is true, that he is presently a > British > > > > > subject, > > > > > > > > still. > > > > > > > > > > And many wonder if Obama was in fact born in Kenya, > especially > > > after > > > > > > > > an eye-witness > > > > > > > > says< > > > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/03/obama-in-1980-said-he-was-born.. > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > is what Obama claimed in 1980. > > > > > > > > > > The disclosure of Obama's original vital > > > > > > > > records< > > > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/04/hawaii-petition-campaign-launc.. > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > alone settle these doubts and clarify for all time, the issue > of > > > > > Obama's > > > > > > > > eligibility. The question is, "where are they being kept?", > and > > > that > > > > > > > > depends on where he was born. > > > > > > > > > > © 2010, The Post & Email <http://www.thepostemail.com/>. All > > > rights > > > > > > > reserved > > > > > > > > internationally, unless otherwise specified. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > > > > > For options & help seehttp:// > > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > > > For options & help seehttp:// > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > ... > > > > read more » > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
