your posts aren't worth reading you are a waste of time and space
a knee jerk trog On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:28 PM, VT Sean Lewis <[email protected]>wrote: > Bruce it is easier if you first read the comment that preceded my > response > so if you can't keep up, you will not look so stupid when you comment. > > Gaining seats in the House by the Republicans was the leading comment > > On Jan 11, 2:07 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > who Clinton? > > > > what are you babbling about moron? > > > > it's Bill Clinton talking about Obama > > > > you are really too stupid to post things on the internet > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:37 PM, VT Sean Lewis < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > This from the experts who had the Republicans winning in 2006 and > > > 2008. > > > > > On Jan 11, 1:10 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Your points are silly > > > > > > No Demwit flak anywhere thinks the demwits are going to gain seats > > > overall > > > > > > You are just a flatulent braying jackass as always spinning for your > > > fascist > > > > overlords > > > > > > You will both meet justice soon > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:45 AM, VT Sean Lewis > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > No I just pointed out an obvious point you always seem to ignore. > > > > > > > And more Republicans are dropping out the Democrats, > > > > > another point you seem to forget > > > > > > > Also a poorly worded comment is no where in the same > > > > > category as Obama the magic negro > > > > > > > On Jan 11, 10:39 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > poor little moron > > > > > > > > you think that the fact that your racist failing bumbling leaders > are > > > > > > dropping out and dropping in the polls is OK as long as > Republicans > > > > > aren't > > > > > > popular either > > > > > > > > a very revealing confession on your part my little stalinoid fart > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, VT Sean Lewis > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > which polls are you talking about? > > > > > > > > > They must not include Republican poll numbers, > > > > > > > > > On Jan 11, 10:32 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > polls would indicate that know one takes you or your leader > or > > > your > > > > > media > > > > > > > > seriously > > > > > > > > > > you are ticks and it is time for you to be picked off and > burnt > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:28 AM, VT Sean Lewis > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Oh Please, you fools are reaching and making fools of > > > yourselves. > > > > > > > > > No one takes these crazy fringe nuts seriously, but you > keep it > > > > > > > > > up, makes the 9/11 conspirators look sane. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 11, 9:52 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Let’s not Forget: Bill Clinton was the first “Birther” > > > > > > > > > > ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA, AUGUST 4TH, 2008, QUESTIONED > OBAMA'S > > > > > > > > > ELIGIBILITY*by > > > > > > > > > > John Charlton* > > > > > > > > > > > > (Jan. 11, 2010) — Let's not forget that the first > "Birther" > > > of > > > > > note, > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > Bill Clinton. "Birther" is the derogatory appellation > used > > > by > > > > > Obama > > > > > > > > > > supporters to ridicule those who ask why Obama won't show > his > > > > > birth > > > > > > > > > > certificate. > > > > > > > > > > > > Late last night, The Post & Email published the results > of > > > recent > > > > > > > > > > investigation < > > > > > > > > > > http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/10/red-flags-overlooked/> > > > of > > > > > > > > > > the issue, by a citizen journalist, which explain that > the > > > Hawaii > > > > > > > > > Department > > > > > > > > > > of Health knows Obama's alleged birth certificate > (displayed > > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Internet > > > > > > > > > > as an electronic image of a Certification of Live Birth) > is a > > > > > > > forgery. > > > > > > > > > > > > In this context, it should be noted that Bill Clinton was > > > > > apparently > > > > > > > > > aware > > > > > > > > > > of the forgery as early as Obama's birthday in 2008. > > > > > > > > > > He made these comments on Good Morning America. You can > view > > > the > > > > > > > > > > video here< > > > > > > > > http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/an-insightful-note-from-a.. > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > The comment was mentioned by the Associated Press, in an > > > unsigned > > > > > > > > > > report< > > > > > > > > http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-04-clinton.. > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > > > filed > > > > > > > > > > the same day: > > > > > > > > > > > > "I never was mad at Sen. Obama," the former president > said. > > > "I > > > > > think > > > > > > > > > > everybody's got a right to run for president who > qualifies > > > under > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Constitution. And I'd be the last person to begrudge > anybody > > > > > their > > > > > > > > > > ambition." > > > > > > > > > > > > Evidently no one at the AP was willing to take the heat > for > > > even > > > > > > > > > repeating > > > > > > > > > > the comment. But one political scientist > > > > > > > > > > explained< > > > > > > > > http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/an-insightful-note-from-a.. > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > > Clinton meant by his statement: > > > > > > > > > > > > If you notice, at the beginning of the video, Bill makes > a > > > > > comment > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > > Obama being held to a different standard than others who > have > > > run > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > president, but he also said (around the 44 second mark): > > > “That > > > > > > > everybody > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > a right to run for president *as long as they’re > qualified > > > under > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Constitution*” (emphasis mine). > > > > > > > > > > > > Here’s the thing – I have followed Bill’s political > career > > > for a > > > > > long > > > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > > > (and I have studied it closely because I am a political > > > > > scientist) > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > *he > > > > > > > > > > did NOT say this accidentally. This is a message to > > > TexasDarlin’ > > > > > (I > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > sure > > > > > > > > > > he knows all about her posts and her reports) to keep > > > pressing in > > > > > on > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > citizenship/birth certificate issue.* > > > > > > > > > > > > NOTE: That is NOT what Bill Clinton said. We’re just > reading > > > > > between > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > lines, perhaps hopefully. > > > > > > > > > > > > Though I can probably never prove this (and Bill would > likely > > > > > deny > > > > > > > it, if > > > > > > > > > he > > > > > > > > > > were ever confronted with it), I know that Bill was > trying to > > > say > > > > > – > > > > > > > “keep > > > > > > > > > > going!” > > > > > > > > > > > > TexasDarlin was a blog from Texas, published by a female > > > > > supporter of > > > > > > > > > > Hillary Clinton. The blog has been temporarily revived on > the > > > > > > > Internet in > > > > > > > > > > support of Scott Brown's candidacy; however, the blog > posts > > > no > > > > > longer > > > > > > > > > exists > > > > > > > > > > on the web. > > > > > > > > > > > > In response to Clinton's comment, the obvious conclusion > was > > > > > being > > > > > > > drawn > > > > > > > > > > within hours of Clinton's comment: "Is Obama qualified > under > > > the > > > > > > > > > > constitution?", asked JohnF, a platinum member, at > > > > > > > > > > CommonGroundsPolitics.net< > > > > > > > > http://www.commongroundpolitics.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=22378>, > > > > > > > > > > at 3 PM that afternoon. > > > > > > > > > > > > The qualifications required by a presidential Candidate > are > > > > > stated in > > > > > > > > > > the original > > > > > > > > > > text< > > > > > > > > http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html> > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > the U.S. Constitution, in Article II, section i, clause > 5: > > > > > > > > > > > > No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of > the > > > > > United > > > > > > > > > States, > > > > > > > > > > at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall > be > > > > > eligible > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible > to > > > that > > > > > > > Office > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, > and > > > been > > > > > > > > > fourteen > > > > > > > > > > Years a Resident within the United States. > > > > > > > > > > > > Certainly Bill Clinton was not disputing that Obama was > at > > > least > > > > > 35 > > > > > > > years > > > > > > > > > > old! > > > > > > > > > > > > And certainly he was not disputing that Obama had been a > > > resident > > > > > of > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > United States since 1994! > > > > > > > > > > > > So the only thing left, is the natural born citizenship > > > issue. > > > > > And > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > would mean that Clinton was reminding us that to be a > natural > > > > > born > > > > > > > > > citizen > > > > > > > > > > one must be born > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) On U.S. soil > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) of a father who is a U.S. Citizen, and > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) of a mother who is a U.S. Citizen, > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) each of which 3 criteria must be true at the moment of > > > birth > > > > > > > > > > > > For more information about the natural born citizenship > > > > > requirement, > > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > > Post & Email's article on the 4 Supreme Court > > > > > > > > > > Cases< > > > > > > > > http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-n.. > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > > have defined what this term means, following what > Emmerich de > > > > > Vattel > > > > > > > > > wrote > > > > > > > > > > in his treatise, The Law of Nations. > > > > > > > > > > > > Few dispute that Obama's mother was not a U.S. Citizen. > > > Though > > > > > there > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > speculation< > > > > > > > > http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/05/who%e2%80%99s-your-daddy-who%e.. > > > > > > > > > .>about > > > > > > > > > > who she was, especially among Hillary supporters. > > > > > > > > > > > > Few doubt that Obama's father was Barack Obama Senior, a > > > British > > > > > > > subject; > > > > > > > > > > and it has been conclusively > > > > > > > > > > shown< > > > > > > > > http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/british-law-declares-obama-a-b.. > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > if Obama's birth story is true, that he is presently a > > > British > > > > > > > subject, > > > > > > > > > > still. > > > > > > > > > > > > And many wonder if Obama was in fact born in Kenya, > > > especially > > > > > after > > > > > > > > > > an eye-witness > > > > > > > > > > says< > > > > > > > > http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/03/obama-in-1980-said-he-was-born.. > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > is what Obama claimed in 1980. > > > > ... > > > > read more » > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
