Your points are silly

No Demwit flak anywhere thinks the demwits are going to gain seats overall

You are just a flatulent braying jackass as always spinning for your fascist
overlords

You will both meet justice soon

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:45 AM, VT Sean Lewis
<[email protected]>wrote:

> No I just pointed out an obvious point you always seem to ignore.
>
> And more Republicans are dropping out the Democrats,
> another point you seem to forget
>
> Also a poorly worded comment is no where in the same
> category as Obama the magic negro
>
> On Jan 11, 10:39 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> > poor little moron
> >
> > you think that the fact that your racist failing bumbling leaders are
> > dropping out and dropping in the polls is OK as long as Republicans
> aren't
> > popular either
> >
> > a very revealing confession on your part my little stalinoid fart
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, VT Sean Lewis
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > which polls are you talking about?
> >
> > > They must not include Republican poll numbers,
> >
> > > On Jan 11, 10:32 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > polls would indicate that know one takes you or your leader or your
> media
> > > > seriously
> >
> > > > you are ticks and it is time for you to be picked off and burnt
> >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:28 AM, VT Sean Lewis
> > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > Oh Please, you fools are reaching and making fools of yourselves.
> > > > > No one takes these crazy fringe nuts seriously, but you keep it
> > > > > up, makes the 9/11 conspirators look sane.
> >
> > > > > On Jan 11, 9:52 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Let’s not Forget: Bill Clinton was the first “Birther”
> > > > > > ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA, AUGUST 4TH, 2008, QUESTIONED OBAMA'S
> > > > > ELIGIBILITY*by
> > > > > > John Charlton*
> >
> > > > > > (Jan. 11, 2010) — Let's not forget that the first "Birther" of
> note,
> > > was
> > > > > > Bill Clinton.  "Birther" is the derogatory appellation used by
> Obama
> > > > > > supporters to ridicule those who ask why Obama won't show his
> birth
> > > > > > certificate.
> >
> > > > > > Late last night, The Post & Email published the results of recent
> > > > > > investigation <
> > > > >http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/10/red-flags-overlooked/> of
> > > > > > the issue, by a citizen journalist, which explain that the Hawaii
> > > > > Department
> > > > > > of Health knows Obama's alleged birth certificate (displayed on
> the
> > > > > Internet
> > > > > > as an electronic image of a Certification of Live Birth) is a
> > > forgery.
> >
> > > > > > In this context, it should be noted that Bill Clinton was
> apparently
> > > > > aware
> > > > > > of the forgery as early as Obama's birthday in 2008.
> > > > > > He made these comments on Good Morning America.  You can view the
> > > > > > video here<
> > > > >
> http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/an-insightful-note-from-a..
> > > .>
> > > > > > .
> >
> > > > > > The comment was mentioned by the Associated Press, in an unsigned
> > > > > > report<
> > > > >
> http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-04-clinton..
> > > .>
> > > > > > filed
> > > > > > the same day:
> >
> > > > > > "I never was mad at Sen. Obama," the former president said. "I
> think
> > > > > > everybody's got a right to run for president who qualifies under
> the
> > > > > > Constitution. And I'd be the last person to begrudge anybody
> their
> > > > > > ambition."
> >
> > > > > > Evidently no one at the AP was willing to take the heat for even
> > > > > repeating
> > > > > > the comment. But one political scientist
> > > > > > explained<
> > > > >
> http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/an-insightful-note-from-a..
> > > .>
> > > > > > what
> > > > > > Clinton meant by his statement:
> >
> > > > > > If you notice, at the beginning of the video, Bill makes a
> comment
> > > about
> > > > > > Obama being held to a different standard than others who have run
> for
> > > > > > president, but he also said (around the 44 second mark): “That
> > > everybody
> > > > > has
> > > > > > a right to run for president *as long as they’re qualified under
> the
> > > > > > Constitution*” (emphasis mine).
> >
> > > > > > Here’s the thing – I have followed Bill’s political career for a
> long
> > > > > time
> > > > > > (and I have studied it closely because I am a political
> scientist)
> > > and
> > > > > *he
> > > > > > did NOT say this accidentally. This is a message to TexasDarlin’
> (I
> > > am
> > > > > sure
> > > > > > he knows all about her posts and her reports) to keep pressing in
> on
> > > the
> > > > > > citizenship/birth certificate issue.*
> >
> > > > > > NOTE: That is NOT what Bill Clinton said. We’re just reading
> between
> > > the
> > > > > > lines, perhaps hopefully.
> >
> > > > > > Though I can probably never prove this (and Bill would likely
> deny
> > > it, if
> > > > > he
> > > > > > were ever confronted with it), I know that Bill was trying to say
> –
> > > “keep
> > > > > > going!”
> >
> > > > > > TexasDarlin was a blog from Texas, published by a female
> supporter of
> > > > > > Hillary Clinton. The blog has been temporarily revived on the
> > > Internet in
> > > > > > support of Scott Brown's candidacy; however, the blog posts no
> longer
> > > > > exists
> > > > > > on the web.
> >
> > > > > > In response to Clinton's comment, the obvious conclusion was
> being
> > > drawn
> > > > > > within hours of Clinton's comment:  "Is Obama qualified under the
> > > > > > constitution?", asked JohnF, a platinum member, at
> > > > > > CommonGroundsPolitics.net<
> > > > >
> http://www.commongroundpolitics.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=22378>,
> > > > > > at 3 PM that afternoon.
> >
> > > > > > The qualifications required by a presidential Candidate are
> stated in
> > > > > > the original
> > > > > > text<
> > > > >
> http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html>
> > > of
> > > > > > the U.S. Constitution, in Article II, section i, clause 5:
> >
> > > > > > No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the
> United
> > > > > States,
> > > > > > at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be
> eligible
> > > to
> > > > > the
> > > > > > Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that
> > > Office
> > > > > who
> > > > > > shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been
> > > > > fourteen
> > > > > > Years a Resident within the United States.
> >
> > > > > > Certainly Bill Clinton was not disputing that Obama was at least
> 35
> > > years
> > > > > > old!
> >
> > > > > > And certainly he was not disputing that Obama had been a resident
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > United States since 1994!
> >
> > > > > > So the only thing left, is the natural born citizenship issue.
>  And
> > > that
> > > > > > would mean that Clinton was reminding us that to be a natural
> born
> > > > > citizen
> > > > > > one must be born
> >
> > > > > > 1) On U.S. soil
> >
> > > > > > 2) of a father who is a U.S. Citizen, and
> >
> > > > > > 3) of a mother who is a U.S. Citizen,
> >
> > > > > > 4) each of which 3 criteria must be true at the moment of birth
> >
> > > > > > For more information about the natural born citizenship
> requirement,
> > > see
> > > > > The
> > > > > > Post & Email's article on the 4 Supreme Court
> > > > > > Cases<
> > > > >
> http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-n..
> > > .>
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > have defined what this term means, following what Emmerich de
> Vattel
> > > > > wrote
> > > > > > in his treatise, The Law of Nations.
> >
> > > > > > Few dispute that Obama's mother was not a U.S. Citizen. Though
> there
> > > is
> > > > > > speculation<
> > > > >
> http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/05/who%e2%80%99s-your-daddy-who%e..
> > > > > .>about
> > > > > > who she was, especially among Hillary supporters.
> >
> > > > > > Few doubt that Obama's father was Barack Obama Senior, a British
> > > subject;
> > > > > > and it has been conclusively
> > > > > > shown<
> > > > >
> http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/british-law-declares-obama-a-b..
> > > .>
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > if Obama's birth story is true, that he is presently a British
> > > subject,
> > > > > > still.
> >
> > > > > > And many wonder if Obama was in fact born in Kenya, especially
> after
> > > > > > an eye-witness
> > > > > > says<
> > > > >
> http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/03/obama-in-1980-said-he-was-born..
> > > .>
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > is what Obama claimed in 1980.
> >
> > > > > > The disclosure of Obama's original vital
> > > > > > records<
> > > > >
> http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/04/hawaii-petition-campaign-launc..
> > > .>
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > alone settle these doubts and clarify for all time, the issue of
> > > Obama's
> > > > > > eligibility.  The question is, "where are they being kept?", and
> that
> > > > > > depends on where he was born.
> >
> > > > > > © 2010, The Post & Email <http://www.thepostemail.com/>. All
> rights
> > > > > reserved
> > > > > > internationally, unless otherwise specified.
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >
> > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> >
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to