Let’s not Forget: Bill Clinton was the first “Birther”
----
never forget

when or if the truth comes out about his birthplace we can discuss
until then, he's suspect

On Jan 11, 8:52 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> Let’s not Forget: Bill Clinton was the first “Birther”
> ON GOOD MORNING AMERICA, AUGUST 4TH, 2008, QUESTIONED OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY*by
> John Charlton*
>
> (Jan. 11, 2010) — Let's not forget that the first "Birther" of note, was
> Bill Clinton.  "Birther" is the derogatory appellation used by Obama
> supporters to ridicule those who ask why Obama won't show his birth
> certificate.
>
> Late last night, The Post & Email published the results of recent
> investigation <http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/10/red-flags-overlooked/> 
> of
> the issue, by a citizen journalist, which explain that the Hawaii Department
> of Health knows Obama's alleged birth certificate (displayed on the Internet
> as an electronic image of a Certification of Live Birth) is a forgery.
>
> In this context, it should be noted that Bill Clinton was apparently aware
> of the forgery as early as Obama's birthday in 2008.
> He made these comments on Good Morning America.  You can view the
> video 
> here<http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/an-insightful-note-from-a...>
> .
>
> The comment was mentioned by the Associated Press, in an unsigned
> report<http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-04-clinton...>
> filed
> the same day:
>
> "I never was mad at Sen. Obama," the former president said. "I think
> everybody's got a right to run for president who qualifies under the
> Constitution. And I'd be the last person to begrudge anybody their
> ambition."
>
> Evidently no one at the AP was willing to take the heat for even repeating
> the comment. But one political scientist
> explained<http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/05/an-insightful-note-from-a...>
> what
> Clinton meant by his statement:
>
> If you notice, at the beginning of the video, Bill makes a comment about
> Obama being held to a different standard than others who have run for
> president, but he also said (around the 44 second mark): “That everybody has
> a right to run for president *as long as they’re qualified under the
> Constitution*” (emphasis mine).
>
> Here’s the thing – I have followed Bill’s political career for a long time
> (and I have studied it closely because I am a political scientist) and *he
> did NOT say this accidentally. This is a message to TexasDarlin’ (I am sure
> he knows all about her posts and her reports) to keep pressing in on the
> citizenship/birth certificate issue.*
>
> NOTE: That is NOT what Bill Clinton said. We’re just reading between the
> lines, perhaps hopefully.
>
> Though I can probably never prove this (and Bill would likely deny it, if he
> were ever confronted with it), I know that Bill was trying to say – “keep
> going!”
>
> TexasDarlin was a blog from Texas, published by a female supporter of
> Hillary Clinton. The blog has been temporarily revived on the Internet in
> support of Scott Brown's candidacy; however, the blog posts no longer exists
> on the web.
>
> In response to Clinton's comment, the obvious conclusion was being drawn
> within hours of Clinton's comment:  "Is Obama qualified under the
> constitution?", asked JohnF, a platinum member, at
> CommonGroundsPolitics.net<http://www.commongroundpolitics.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=22378>,
> at 3 PM that afternoon.
>
> The qualifications required by a presidential Candidate are stated in
> the original
> text<http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html> 
> of
> the U.S. Constitution, in Article II, section i, clause 5:
>
> No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States,
> at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the
> Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who
> shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen
> Years a Resident within the United States.
>
> Certainly Bill Clinton was not disputing that Obama was at least 35 years
> old!
>
> And certainly he was not disputing that Obama had been a resident of the
> United States since 1994!
>
> So the only thing left, is the natural born citizenship issue.  And that
> would mean that Clinton was reminding us that to be a natural born citizen
> one must be born
>
> 1) On U.S. soil
>
> 2) of a father who is a U.S. Citizen, and
>
> 3) of a mother who is a U.S. Citizen,
>
> 4) each of which 3 criteria must be true at the moment of birth
>
> For more information about the natural born citizenship requirement, see The
> Post & Email's article on the 4 Supreme Court
> Cases<http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-n...>
> which
> have defined what this term means, following what Emmerich de Vattel wrote
> in his treatise, The Law of Nations.
>
> Few dispute that Obama's mother was not a U.S. Citizen. Though there is
> speculation<http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/05/who%e2%80%99s-your-daddy-who%e...>about
> who she was, especially among Hillary supporters.
>
> Few doubt that Obama's father was Barack Obama Senior, a British subject;
> and it has been conclusively
> shown<http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/24/british-law-declares-obama-a-b...>
> that
> if Obama's birth story is true, that he is presently a British subject,
> still.
>
> And many wonder if Obama was in fact born in Kenya, especially after
> an eye-witness
> says<http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/12/03/obama-in-1980-said-he-was-born...>
> that
> is what Obama claimed in 1980.
>
> The disclosure of Obama's original vital
> records<http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/04/hawaii-petition-campaign-launc...>
> will
> alone settle these doubts and clarify for all time, the issue of Obama's
> eligibility.  The question is, "where are they being kept?", and that
> depends on where he was born.
>
> © 2010, The Post & Email <http://www.thepostemail.com/>. All rights reserved
> internationally, unless otherwise specified.
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to