Cite a source, Tommy. All you ever do is spout rhetoric. Cite a source.

On 9/21/2010 12:20 PM, Tommy News wrote:
*False.*
**
*Many who have been discharged have been outed by others.*

On 9/21/10, *THE ANNOINTED ONE* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Tommy Boy,

    The law is quite literal...(extremely rare these days).. Don't Ask,
    (the military doesn't) Don't Tell... that is left entirely up to the
    individual... it must come FROM his or her mouth...( Little drum
    roll ).... Not in it, to be valid as a career killer.


    On Sep 21, 10:31 am, Tommy News <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    > *No, Keith. Wrong. *
    > *There have been countless backstabbing "efforts" and vendettas
    to "out"
    > closeted and silent members of the military, including baiting,
    spreading
    > rumors, searching possessions and correspondence, entrapment, etc.*
    > *It is those who chose to "enforce" the policy,  who caused it
    to fail.*
    > **
    > *Billions have been wasted on these witch hunts and discharges.*
    > *DADT is a failure. Always has been. Since 1993. *
    > **
    > *Repeal it NOW, no further "delay". *
    >
    > On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > > No Tom, the policy has worked fine.   It has been those who
    chose to
    > > violate the policy who have had their "lives and carreers ruined".
    >
    > > Again, the military is no place for a "Gay Parade".......If
    you think that
    > > rescinding the DADT policy is going to somehow allow you and
    your buddies to
    > > get up and announce, "We're Here And We're Queer"; you are
    sadly mistaken.
    >
    > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Tommy News
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >
    > >> *No, Keith, the DADT policy is a complete falure and it has
    never worked.
    > >> *
    > >> **
    > >> *Thousands of lives and careers have been ruined.*
    > >> **
    > >> *No further biased "study" or delay should be tolerated.
    > >> *
    >
    > >>   On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >
    > >>> No Tom, the DADT was enacted, by the Clinton Administration
    in 1993.  The
    > >>> policy has worked, successfully for seventeen years.
    >
    > >>> Is it time to rescind the policy?  I tend to agree that it
    is, but not
    > >>> until such time as the military has a chance to weigh in,
    and determine the
    > >>> effects of such a change in policy, and "how/what" type of
    policy to
    > >>> implement as a replacement.
    >
    > >>> Sexual practices has no place in our military.  There have
    been Gays in
    > >>> our military who have fought and defended our Nation since
    1776.   No policy
    > >>> is going to change that.   We especially don't want a
    military that is
    > >>> weakened by a bunch of folks with an agenda!!
    >
    > >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Tommy News
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote:
    >
    > >>>> *No, Keith.*
    > >>>> **
    > >>>> *The Pentagon has had since 1993 to review this failed
    policy which has
    > >>>> ruined thousands of lives and careers.*
    > >>>> **
    > >>>> *No further delay is acceptable.*
    > >>>> *Delay means do nothing.
    > >>>> *
    >
    > >>>>  On 9/21/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >
    > >>>>>   No Tom, you're missing the real issue here, blinded by some
    > >>>>> secondary issue.
    >
    > >>>>> First, the Pentagon should have every right to review and
    determine how
    > >>>>> repeal of DADT will effect the military.  Second, and more
    importantly, the
    > >>>>> goal by the Marxists is to lock the Republicans out of
    amending the proposed
    > >>>>> Defense  Appropriations bill now before the Congress.  I
    don't trust the
    > >>>>> likes of Chuck Schumer, Barney Frank, and a host of other
    Marxists
    > >>>>> controlling the vote over Defense Appropriations.  You
    shouldn't either.
    >
    > >>>>>  From CNN:
    >
    >
    >>>>>http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/09/20/senate.defense.bill/index.html
    >
    > >>>>> But in a statement issued Monday night, Senator Susan Collins
    > >>>>> (Confused, Maine)  said she would side with the rest of
    the GOP because the
    > >>>>> Democratic leadership of the Senate "intends to shut
    Republicans out of the
    > >>>>> debate."
    >
    > >>>>> Collins said she agreed with the chairman of the Joint
    Chiefs of Staff,
    > >>>>> Adm. Mike Mullen, that the law is "simply not fair." But
    she said Senate
    > >>>>> Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, should give
    Republicans and Democrats
    > >>>>> "an equal opportunity" to offer amendments to the defense
    bill.
    >
    > >>>>> "Now is not the time to play politics, and I again call on
    the majority
    > >>>>> leader to work with Republican leaders to negotiate an
    agreement so that the
    > >>>>> Senate can debate the defense bill this week," Collins said.
    >
    > >>>>> In a separate statement, Snowe also indicated she would
    support a
    > >>>>> Republican filibuster, saying the chamber should be
    allowed a full debate on
    > >>>>> the measure. Snowe also questioned why the Senate would
    vote on repeal
    > >>>>> before the military has completed its review.
    >
    > >>>>> "We should all have the opportunity to review that report
    which is to
    > >>>>> be completed on December 1, as we reevaluate this policy
    and the
    > >>>>> implementation of any new changes," Snowe's statement said.
    >
    > >>>>> The defense authorization act, which is a broad defense
    policy bill,
    > >>>>> would not rescind "don't ask, don't tell" until after the
    Pentagon completes
    > >>>>> a review of the repeal's impact on the military. The
    review is due in
    > >>>>> December and would serve as the basis for necessary
    certification by the
    > >>>>> president, defense secretary and chairman of the Joint
    Chiefs of Staff that
    > >>>>> the military could handle repealing the policy.
    >
    > >>>>> --
    > >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    > >>>>> For options & help
    seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
    <http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum>
    >
    > >>>>> * Visit our other community
    athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    <http://www.PoliticalForum.com/><http://www.politicalforum.com/>
    > >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    > >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
    >
    > >>>> --
    > >>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
    > >>>> Have a great day,
    > >>>> Tommy
    >
    > >>>> --
    > >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    > >>>> For options & help
    seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
    <http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum>
    >
    > >>>> * Visit our other community
    athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    <http://www.PoliticalForum.com/><http://www.politicalforum.com/>
    > >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    > >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
    >
    > >>> --
    > >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    > >>> For options & help
    seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
    <http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum>
    >
    > >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    <http://www.PoliticalForum.com/><http://www.politicalforum.com/>
    > >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    > >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
    >
    > >> --
    > >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
    > >> Have a great day,
    > >> Tommy
    >
    > >> --
    > >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    > >> For options & help
    seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
    <http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum>
    >
    > >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    <http://www.PoliticalForum.com/><http://www.politicalforum.com/>
    > >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    > >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
    >
    > > --
    > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    > > For options & help
    seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
    <http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum>
    >
    > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    <http://www.PoliticalForum.com/><http://www.politicalforum.com/>
    > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
    >
    > --
    > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
    > Have a great day,
    > Tommy

    --
    Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
    For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

    * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
    * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
    * Read the latest breaking news, and more.




--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy --
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Your personal email. Anytime, anywhere.
Ridiculously affordable at $19.95. No contracts.
http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html <%20http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html>

--
*I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government*

*"The 'art' of politics is diverting attention from what's really happening. What separates politicians from other criminal organizations is superior public relations."
- Marc Stevens

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free it expects something that cannot be."
- Thomas Jefferson*

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to