The media isn’t helping the American cause. As I work to save the USA, I look for varied ways of explaining what ordinary Americans need to know. I want everyone to understand my motives as well as my solutions to this nation’s woes. The latter solutions are evident in every sentence of my ‘New Constitution of the United States of America’. I’ve written such to benefit John Q. Public in towns, cities and rural areas all across this country. No motive for personal glory could have compelled me to devote so much of my talent to such an important odyssey—for fourteen plus years and counting.
Gov. Mike Huckabee toned-down his ‘aren’t-I-sweet’ manner on his last show. But true-to-type, he smiled when he said, “The Constitution grants Congress the power to levy taxes.” Yes, Governor, but with this crucial SPIRIT-of-the-Constitution proviso: *** Nothing that government does, nor laws that they pass has validity without the consent of the governed! *** When our elected dictators consistently do things not agreeable to the majority of the voters, they are in violation of their fiduciary responsibility to… REPRESENT their constituents. My New Constitution requires that every public official take this oath: “All local, state and federal officer holders and employees—upon taking office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath: “I, (Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to be unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the citizens, as guaranteed by the Constitution, and I shall expect my coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to this oath.” And … “Votes taken on bills are final. If there is less than a 55% yea vote, as below, no revoting on a bill, unless first substantially changed, can be taken for two years. Passed bills that are constitutional become law, but when possible, laws shall be probationary for one year to allow more Citizen input—with no disfavor being shown to such latter input. Laws shall be revoted and expunged if new information shows such to have been poorly conceived, or contrary to the Will of the People—especially the law-abiding Citizens most affected. ***Officials not honoring the latter or acting counter to the will of or not in the best interests of their electorate shall be removed.*** Except for elections or referenda, secret ballots shall not be used in governmental nor judicial proceedings, and no part of any official public meeting shall be held in private.” And … “Representatives shall be elected to two year terms by the vote of the People of their districts on the first Tuesday in November of even number years, and shall ***fairly represent all blocs of their electorate, or face expulsion.” Glenn Beck, at Fox News, claims that Thomas Jefferson had argued against having a democracy. Note: “A democracy is that form of government that has the people voting on every law.” It is NOT a democracy just having the voters select their supposed representatives. The latter is a Republic, but only if those who are elected actually DO the will of their electorates. *** Our ACTUAL form of government in the USA is closer to an unconstitutional oligarchy, since those in government seldom heed the Will of the People, and most of the 'power’ is vested in the unconstitutional senate. Glenn Beck berates having a democracy, because he misconstrues that such allows small majorities to subjugate the nearly-as-large minority. Nothing could be further from the truth! To wit: A boat load of, say, 100 men, women and children risked all to sail to our new land. Along the way, a storm came up causing everyone to question the wisdom of making the journey. A vote was taken to decide whether to continue or to turn back. 51% chose to continue. Did that mean that the 51% get to ROB and subjugate the 49% who… lost? Hell no! Most people’s concept that the losers in elections are without rights results from our cancerous two-party political system, which has ALWAYS been unconstitutional! What representatives actually get to do is to decide the subtleties of laws that don’t intentionally oppress any portion of the public! I liken that to deciding whether to have waffles or pancakes for breakfast. Neither are harmful to anyone, but someone must decide. A HUGE difference between my New Constitution and the original is that I allow no laws to pass (beyond being probationary) without getting 60% of the vote. Because I don’t want any individuals to have too much power in government, I’ve included, for example, this provision: “Local governments shall have 10 or more councilmen or a direct vote of the People is required to pass ordinances or raise taxes. Upon request by the Executive or 1/5 of the larger governing body, federal, state or local law making authority shall defer to the People on controversial issues where the Will of the People is in doubt. No law nor previous or subsequent vote on any issue shall usurp the right of an informed Public to decide controversial issues in direct referenda; the vote for passage shall be 60%. The apt macro-Will of the People in elections or referenda, as manifested by their votes, shall take precedence over any contrary existing or subsequent law, governmental hierarchy or judicial ruling. Because conditions change, older laws aren’t necessarily the Will of the People.” And … “All assent five-to-four Supreme Court decisions are for one year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall not— on their own—reconsider such issue.” The colossal failure of the media is that they judge a medium’s content by the number of viewers, readers or advertisers. The media value system is based on dollars and cents with no overriding moral imperative. Sean Hannity, lamely, addresses the conservative viewpoints. But by the end of his shows he’s too appreciative of the likes of Bob Beckel, including women, for being his… guests. The latter get to cry about how important the jobs of (God-damned) government workers are, and how those jobs should be protected (socialism!). Hannity hasn’t once said: “Everyday, Barack Obama willfully violates the Constitution— which he fraudulently swore to defend. He has orchestrated the passage of laws that are more hurtful to this economy, and more divisive of this Nation than any other person in our country’s history. Obama is an anti-America socialist/communist—the greatest TRAITOR of all time! While he masquerades as President, in actuality, he’s just a common outlaw who should be hanged for TREASON! The USA can’t survive with Obama, and any of his socialist/communist base, in power. It’s time we straighten-out government by ratifying a New Constitution. Haven’t we had enough ‘talk’ about our problems? Now, we should FIX those problems, beginning with the arrest of Barack Obama for TREASON! And yesterday, wouldn‘t be too soon.” If there is anyone in the media who supposes there is any motivation of any part of it to actually straighten-out our corrupt government(s), I would love to hear that faint message. Canceling your subscriptions and turning off Fox and the rest of the fraud 'news’ shows, could be the only answer. I invite those who might be interested to read: “The Shortest Distance: Harmony Through Prosperity.” (Amazon & B. & N.) Respectfully submitted, — John A. Armistead — Patriot AKA NoEinstein on Google’s sci.physics news group. > On Feb 13, 11:26 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Love thy neighbor, or love thy criminals. > > Polls taken throughout Barack Obama’s tenure as our elected dictator > show that a consistent 40% to 45% think he is doing OK as… President. > That contrasts with as few as 16% of Americans who approve of Obama’s > handling of the US economy. Why isn’t there a parallel between those > two polling questions? Can one’s rating as President not take into > account both overall performance and specific performance? > > In 2004 I had heard glowing reports of an attractive Black man from > Chicago who, supposedly, was delivering rousing speeches. So, I made > it a point to listen when Obama addressed the Democratic Convention > that year. My reaction wasn’t favorable. The words of the speech > were OK, but Obama was stony-faced and emotionless. He talked in a > modified monotone—dropping his voice at the end of sentences as though > his energy had drained out. The most noticeable aspect of his > bearing, as a speaker, was the regularity with which he turned his > head from side to side while reading teleprompters. Though he was > articulate sounding, Obama didn’t seem to be enjoying the message he > was delivering. Where there is real passion, usually there are > changes in speaking tone, changes in body language, and apt > gesturing. Obama showed none of those. Whoever that ‘attractive > Black man from Chicago’ was, he was keeping the true identity of the > speaker hidden from public view. That fact made me feel very uneasy, > mostly, because other people, apparently, were only seeing the > slender, suave and handsome man, and not seeing the likely psychosis > lurking below that man’s surface. > > Bill Kristol of the ‘Weekly Standard’, a supposed conservative > magazine, is a regular ‘guest contributor’ on Fox News. On Chris > Wallace’s show, Sunday, Kristol was his usual smiley self while he > defended not firing policemen and librarians as part of needed budget > cuts. Though I’ve never read a page of that magazine, I could > immediately tell that Kristol is a liberal. His cast-in-stone smile > also shows him to be a phony of the worst kind. When I was a kid, my > father, who was a professional portrait photographer, told me that men > don’t smile ‘naturally’, without being coaxed. I’ve observed that men > who are not trustworthy will smile excessively to created the opposite > illusion. > > Bill O’Reilly smiles and chuckles his way though most of his shows. > After interviewing Obama the night of the Super Bowl, O’Reilly said > that Obama—who was all toothy-smiles the entire interview—is a > friendly and likable man (gag… gag…). O’Reilly is this liberal > Harvard luck-out with a moron’s IQ telling his like-minded viewers > that THE most divisive and hurtful man to the country in US history > is… likable. Regularly doing that on national TV, as O’Reilly does, > is, I believe, aiding and abetting treason. For that reason, Bill > O’Reilly should hang for treason right along side his idol, Obama, as > part of the cleansing to rid corrupt socialist conspirators from our > midst. > > This week, Ron Paul got the highest number of straw votes for > President at the CPAC convention. Three years ago Paul could have > become President simply by saying these words: “The USA is broke > financially. And the Federal Government is broke morally. No one in > Washington considers the costs and the negative effects of the > legislation being passed. With every new law, our civil liberties go > down, and our share of the national debt goes… up. A logical solution > to our failed government is to ratify a stronger New Constitution. > The object of such should be to, once again, put the People in charge > of government, rather than allowing government to keep thinking it is > in charge of the People. To further that objective, I hereby RESIGN > my House Seat in order to work for a better America by way of a New > Constitution of the United States of America. I urge all patriots who > agree with me to rally to that cause!” > > But Ron Paul shrank back into obscurity amid the empty ritual of the > Capital after saying, “Elections are for the short term. A Revolution > will take longer.” Ron Paul doesn’t have… the (New) Constitution to > lead a Revolution. But I do! > > Two other prominent political or media figures who are clear PHONIES > are former Governor Mike Huckabee and Former Governor Mitt Romney. > Both of those are smile-aholics. “One glance at Huckabee’s smile > could give dentists tooth decay!” No man who fakes playing a guitar > on each of his sweet, sweet shows has the honesty and integrity to be > a janitor at any church, let alone President of the USA. > > Romney showed his true colors after the McCain-Palin ticket was > finalized. Instead of smiles, I detected POISON in Romney’s bearing > and in his remarks. In my opinion, the ‘dual personality’ of that man > disqualifies him to ever be President. This country can’t ‘take’ two > phony Presidents in a row! Though I never approved of George Bush > invading Iraq, he was one of our more what-you-see-is what-you-get > presidents. We should look for that kind of honesty in future > presidents! > > Of the ‘possibles’ for President, Newt Gingrich has many plusses. The > man is smart and well-informed. There is a pleasantness and a > seriousness in his bearing and delivery of message. He has a stable, > reassuring quality, and an honest candor that makes the listener feel > they are getting the truth, never a run-around. > > The Donald has the smarts and the “Presidential Bearing” to be > President. However, for leading a bankrupt nation, I’d shy away from > anyone who has made borrowing money to get out of business binds an… > art form. The USA cannot… borrow (or print) any more money! Only > massive cutbacks (75%) will save us from our debt. Having “nice” > police and “nice” librarians lose their jobs shouldn’t be a > catastrophe if the removal of burdensome restrictions on businesses in > this country creates another post war (WW II) boom. By working and > saving during a booming economy, most people can provide for their own > “security” for the future. Private insurance, shopped across state > lines, should replace Medicare and Medicaid—which were so bankrupting > this country, even before Obama came on the screen. > > 45% of those polled think Obama is doing OK as President. Those same > people, probably without exception, voted for the tyrant. In two > year’s time, none of them have had the vision to see that Obama is the > height of HYPOCRISY, insincerity, deceit, dishonesty, duplicity and > self-love. He stabs America in the back while showing his toothy > smile and wearing his tailored suits and ties. In short, he is a > traitor! > > The core of the 45% are the 90% of Black block voters who gladly do > whatever the typical anti-America church that they go to tells them is > fine. They willingly turn their backs on the 55% of Americans who for > too long have been financing the corrupted programs of government. > Blacks don’t “love thy neighbor” like the Bible says, but love > themselves while waiting to GET the (stolen) taxed-away assets of > others. So, Blacks love the criminals, like most of them are willing > to be. > > Glenn Beck supposes that mod violence like happened in Egypt could > happen here. I used to suppose that there are “core” survivalists out > there who hate government so much that they would have begun the > cleansing processes already. In the past, some have proposed that our > Government will start toeing-the-line, if Americans will simply STOP > paying the excessive taxes. Those who do pay the increasing taxes > must truly love their neighbors, the 45% who hope to do little or no > work in the future because of the… charity of the 55%. > > Folks, think about how “American” taxpayers are to so willingly accept > being overtaxed for the benefit of the lazy 45% of our neighbors. > Perhaps I dream to consider how wonderful it would be if everyone who > is able would not be a burden to anyone else. Are there any Blacks > out there who can heed that call? The decision to “love thy neighbor” > is for each of the 45% to make. > > My recently published book explains how having a prosperous free > enterprise system can benefit the vast majority of Americans. The > title is: “The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity.” I hope > many of you, including racial minorities, will get a copy from Amazon > or B. & N. > > Respectfully submitted, > > — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > On Jan 30, 11:38 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Folks: Understanding the fix the USA is in will be easier if more of > > you can read my highly expert analysis of Barack Obama's and Ronald > > Reagan's handwriting. Please talk about what I'm saying. For too > > long, people in this country have been letting the media crooks do > > most of the talking. > > > 8/05/08 > > > Dear Tom: No two people could be more different than Ronald Reagan > > and Barack Obama! If you haven’t read, I am a lifelong graphologist— > > one of, if not the best analyzers of handwriting in the entire World! > > Ronald Reagan’s handwriting shows someone with a nervous temperament. > > But that’s not a “losing it” nervous temperament like John McCain > > has. Reagan was a conventional thinking man; i.e., his value system > > was like that of most good people. His personality showed that he was > > responding to pressures from various fronts, but he could bend rather > > than break. What that means is: Reagan never compromised his > > principles! Those who show a legible, normal-sized and formed > > writing, that also have a nervous but controlled temperament, are salt- > > of-the-Earth people! > > Reagan’s letter forms were legible, but not fussily exact. That > > means that he was practical-minded and not overly concerned with > > ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
