CORRECTION: An email sent directly to me (not be...) — J. A. A. — On Feb 21, 12:25 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks: An email sent directly to be needs to be read by all. — J. A. > A. — > > Dear Bob: I don't have a "draft" of my New Constitution, because it > is substantially finished—ready for the up-or-down vote of the > American People. I am only showing parts of it at a time, on > purpose. Just this week I made about twenty changes to the sentence > structure (copied from the original Constitution) in order to improve > the readability. It must be a document that can be read and > comprehended by average people, not just by the US Supreme Court—which > has royally screwed-up this country. > > All government employees who regularly deal with the public are > required to swear that they have read the New Constitution within 30 > days prior to taking office or taking a government job. There are > dozens of things in there that can get government employees fired, > imprisoned, or put to death. If people will read and obey the > dictates of my New Constitution, hopefully we won't have to imprison > nor execute many people. An example that's apt to what is happening > in Wisconsin: Since the voters (who are the bosses) have decided that > government is too expensive, and decided that teachers, police and > firefighters are needing to be fired, all such government employees > who "riot" or use strong-arm labor practices would be in violation of > their SWORN oaths to be deferential to the People. For willingly > violating that OATH, every singly school teacher picketing in > Wisconsin would instant become FELONS, who would be arrested and > jailed for three years. Additionally, any individual or group working > for the government who advocates socialism or communism (which is what > those teachers are doing) would be in violation of this one-sentence > life-or-death oath: I agree that... "Fair play and democracy shall > have supremacy in America." Those who are orchestrating having the > unconstitutional teachers unions violate the Will of the People > (democracy) would be guilty of TREASON! > > As most know, Barack Obama, our elected dictator, has sided with the > Wisconsin teachers. Thus, he is orchestrating violating the Will of > the People. That is another of Obama's DAILY treasons against the > USA! Folks, get rid of Obama, and our problems as a nation suddenly > start becoming solvable. To understand how much time and attention to > detail I have put into my New Constitution, go back into the threads > of my posts. About 40% of the entire document has already been > revealed. — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: robert prezioso > To: NoEinstein > Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 9:31 PM > Subject: Re: I agree there is no answer for that constitution. > > Dear John: I didn't see a copy of your draft constitution. I think I > would like to read it. We seem to be on the same page on a lot of > things. I do know you have your own agenda. My agenda is trying to > get the word out—now that people like us are talking like this. You > see on TV, today, they talked about how our two-party government is > failing the people. So, they are in some ways waking up. I would > like to help in any way to bite into this corrupt government. So, if > you need anything that I can provide, just write. > > Sincerely, > > Bob Prezioso, also a true American. > > On Feb 19, 7:30 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > Folks: The following was prompted by a direct email to me. (See > > below.) I'd like to share it with you. — John A. Armistead — > > Patriot > > > 02/19/11 > > > Dear Robert (Prezioso): > > > My first essay 'title-set" on Political Forum was: "Start the > > Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the People!" Apparently, > > even the concept of there being a revolution tired most people out. > > They want others to fight their battles for them—even while this > > country is going-down-the-tubes. > > > The absolute shortest way to correct our broke government and corrupt > > institutions is by ratifying my STRONG New Constitution. It's true > > that IF our elected officials had sincerely adhered to the ideals of > > the Founding Fathers, that are expressed in the original Constitution, > > we wouldn't have many of today's problems. Unfortunately, Congress > > and the White House pay lip-service to the Constitution while ignoring > > most of it, most of the time. They are our elected dictators, not our > > elected representatives. > > > Our bad government is mostly just a huge personnel problem. The bad > > personnel began making big promises to the lazy minorities in society > > in order to get enough votes to keep getting elected. It's easy to > > fault the "fat cats" when the lazy outnumber the former a hundred to > > one. > > > Please understand that I have my own agendas which prevent me from > > being an active supporter of your "Save the Country" effort. If > > enough people, like you, will start talking about straightening out > > government, the powers-that-be will come tumbling down. I'll capsule > > your long reply so that others can read it, too. > > > Sincerely, — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > __________ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: robert prezioso > > Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 1:23 AM > > Subject: I agree there is no answer for that Constitution. > > > You seem to realize that our government has over-stepped its rights > > over the people of this country. As I look at it, the way this > > happened is we are too worried about who is getting what from the > > government. On the one hand—the government hand—it keeps us separated > > so we may not be able to protect ourselves from the attacks on us > > every day by the political machines. Do Not Get Me Wrong! I Love > > This Great Country, and I did service the military. But I feel that > > the government has been taken away from the people and is now only for > > themselves. Just look at what they get paid for doing nothing. They > > don't even work all year, and the expenses are all on us. Every rep. > > and sen. gets paid from $150,000 to almost $200,000 a year for doing > > things that we would be put in jail for. > > > If you get a chance, go to my free site. Hey, everybody has to rant > > and vent when it comes to the government. I want to start a new > > political party to take the government back for the people and restore > > the original constitution of the United States which truly gave us the > > power, and where the words: "We The People" mean something. The link, > > below, is the site. Please email any comments that could help me > > improve the content of my site. You seem to be one of the more down- > > to-reality people that I have encountered so far in this forum. > > Please check this out at: http://nownationalorgazationofthewolf.weebly.com/ > > > Thanks for reading, even if you do not go to the site. > > > Bob Prezioso > > > On Feb 13, 11:26 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Love thy neighbor, or love thy criminals. > > > > Polls taken throughout Barack Obama’s tenure as our elected dictator > > > show that a consistent 40% to 45% think he is doing OK as… President. > > > That contrasts with as few as 16% of Americans who approve of Obama’s > > > handling of the US economy. Why isn’t there a parallel between those > > > two polling questions? Can one’s rating as President not take into > > > account both overall performance and specific performance? > > > > In 2004 I had heard glowing reports of an attractive Black man from > > > Chicago who, supposedly, was delivering rousing speeches. So, I made > > > it a point to listen when Obama addressed the Democratic Convention > > > that year. My reaction wasn’t favorable. The words of the speech > > > were OK, but Obama was stony-faced and emotionless. He talked in a > > > modified monotone—dropping his voice at the end of sentences as though > > > his energy had drained out. The most noticeable aspect of his > > > bearing, as a speaker, was the regularity with which he turned his > > > head from side to side while reading teleprompters. Though he was > > > articulate sounding, Obama didn’t seem to be enjoying the message he > > > was delivering. Where there is real passion, usually there are > > > changes in speaking tone, changes in body language, and apt > > > gesturing. Obama showed none of those. Whoever that ‘attractive > > > Black man from Chicago’ was, he was keeping the true identity of the > > > speaker hidden from public view. That fact made me feel very uneasy, > > > mostly, because other people, apparently, were only seeing the > > > slender, suave and handsome man, and not seeing the likely psychosis > > > lurking below that man’s surface. > > > > Bill Kristol of the ‘Weekly Standard’, a supposed conservative > > > magazine, is a regular ‘guest contributor’ on Fox News. On Chris > > > Wallace’s show, Sunday, Kristol was his usual smiley self while he > > > defended not firing policemen and librarians as part of needed budget > > > cuts. Though I’ve never read a page of that magazine, I could > > > immediately tell that Kristol is a liberal. His cast-in-stone smile > > > also shows him to be a phony of the worst kind. When I was a kid, my > > > father, who was a professional portrait photographer, told me that men > > > don’t smile ‘naturally’, without being coaxed. I’ve observed that men > > > who are not trustworthy will smile excessively to created the opposite > > > illusion. > > > > Bill O’Reilly smiles and chuckles his way though most of his shows. > > > After interviewing Obama the night of the Super Bowl, O’Reilly said > > > that Obama—who was all toothy-smiles the entire interview—is a > > > friendly and likable man (gag… gag…). O’Reilly is this liberal > > > Harvard luck-out with a moron’s IQ telling his like-minded viewers > > > that THE most divisive and hurtful man to the > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
