Folks: An email sent directly to be needs to be read by all. — J. A. A. —
Dear Bob: I don't have a "draft" of my New Constitution, because it is substantially finished—ready for the up-or-down vote of the American People. I am only showing parts of it at a time, on purpose. Just this week I made about twenty changes to the sentence structure (copied from the original Constitution) in order to improve the readability. It must be a document that can be read and comprehended by average people, not just by the US Supreme Court—which has royally screwed-up this country. All government employees who regularly deal with the public are required to swear that they have read the New Constitution within 30 days prior to taking office or taking a government job. There are dozens of things in there that can get government employees fired, imprisoned, or put to death. If people will read and obey the dictates of my New Constitution, hopefully we won't have to imprison nor execute many people. An example that's apt to what is happening in Wisconsin: Since the voters (who are the bosses) have decided that government is too expensive, and decided that teachers, police and firefighters are needing to be fired, all such government employees who "riot" or use strong-arm labor practices would be in violation of their SWORN oaths to be deferential to the People. For willingly violating that OATH, every singly school teacher picketing in Wisconsin would instant become FELONS, who would be arrested and jailed for three years. Additionally, any individual or group working for the government who advocates socialism or communism (which is what those teachers are doing) would be in violation of this one-sentence life-or-death oath: I agree that... "Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in America." Those who are orchestrating having the unconstitutional teachers unions violate the Will of the People (democracy) would be guilty of TREASON! As most know, Barack Obama, our elected dictator, has sided with the Wisconsin teachers. Thus, he is orchestrating violating the Will of the People. That is another of Obama's DAILY treasons against the USA! Folks, get rid of Obama, and our problems as a nation suddenly start becoming solvable. To understand how much time and attention to detail I have put into my New Constitution, go back into the threads of my posts. About 40% of the entire document has already been revealed. — John A. Armistead — Patriot ----- Original Message ----- From: robert prezioso To: NoEinstein Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 9:31 PM Subject: Re: I agree there is no answer for that constitution. Dear John: I didn't see a copy of your draft constitution. I think I would like to read it. We seem to be on the same page on a lot of things. I do know you have your own agenda. My agenda is trying to get the word out—now that people like us are talking like this. You see on TV, today, they talked about how our two-party government is failing the people. So, they are in some ways waking up. I would like to help in any way to bite into this corrupt government. So, if you need anything that I can provide, just write. Sincerely, Bob Prezioso, also a true American. > On Feb 19, 7:30 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks: The following was prompted by a direct email to me. (See > below.) I'd like to share it with you. — John A. Armistead — > Patriot > > 02/19/11 > > Dear Robert (Prezioso): > > My first essay 'title-set" on Political Forum was: "Start the > Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the People!" Apparently, > even the concept of there being a revolution tired most people out. > They want others to fight their battles for them—even while this > country is going-down-the-tubes. > > The absolute shortest way to correct our broke government and corrupt > institutions is by ratifying my STRONG New Constitution. It's true > that IF our elected officials had sincerely adhered to the ideals of > the Founding Fathers, that are expressed in the original Constitution, > we wouldn't have many of today's problems. Unfortunately, Congress > and the White House pay lip-service to the Constitution while ignoring > most of it, most of the time. They are our elected dictators, not our > elected representatives. > > Our bad government is mostly just a huge personnel problem. The bad > personnel began making big promises to the lazy minorities in society > in order to get enough votes to keep getting elected. It's easy to > fault the "fat cats" when the lazy outnumber the former a hundred to > one. > > Please understand that I have my own agendas which prevent me from > being an active supporter of your "Save the Country" effort. If > enough people, like you, will start talking about straightening out > government, the powers-that-be will come tumbling down. I'll capsule > your long reply so that others can read it, too. > > Sincerely, — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > __________ > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: robert prezioso > Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 1:23 AM > Subject: I agree there is no answer for that Constitution. > > You seem to realize that our government has over-stepped its rights > over the people of this country. As I look at it, the way this > happened is we are too worried about who is getting what from the > government. On the one hand—the government hand—it keeps us separated > so we may not be able to protect ourselves from the attacks on us > every day by the political machines. Do Not Get Me Wrong! I Love > This Great Country, and I did service the military. But I feel that > the government has been taken away from the people and is now only for > themselves. Just look at what they get paid for doing nothing. They > don't even work all year, and the expenses are all on us. Every rep. > and sen. gets paid from $150,000 to almost $200,000 a year for doing > things that we would be put in jail for. > > If you get a chance, go to my free site. Hey, everybody has to rant > and vent when it comes to the government. I want to start a new > political party to take the government back for the people and restore > the original constitution of the United States which truly gave us the > power, and where the words: "We The People" mean something. The link, > below, is the site. Please email any comments that could help me > improve the content of my site. You seem to be one of the more down- > to-reality people that I have encountered so far in this forum. > Please check this out at: http://nownationalorgazationofthewolf.weebly.com/ > > Thanks for reading, even if you do not go to the site. > > Bob Prezioso > > On Feb 13, 11:26 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > Love thy neighbor, or love thy criminals. > > > Polls taken throughout Barack Obama’s tenure as our elected dictator > > show that a consistent 40% to 45% think he is doing OK as… President. > > That contrasts with as few as 16% of Americans who approve of Obama’s > > handling of the US economy. Why isn’t there a parallel between those > > two polling questions? Can one’s rating as President not take into > > account both overall performance and specific performance? > > > In 2004 I had heard glowing reports of an attractive Black man from > > Chicago who, supposedly, was delivering rousing speeches. So, I made > > it a point to listen when Obama addressed the Democratic Convention > > that year. My reaction wasn’t favorable. The words of the speech > > were OK, but Obama was stony-faced and emotionless. He talked in a > > modified monotone—dropping his voice at the end of sentences as though > > his energy had drained out. The most noticeable aspect of his > > bearing, as a speaker, was the regularity with which he turned his > > head from side to side while reading teleprompters. Though he was > > articulate sounding, Obama didn’t seem to be enjoying the message he > > was delivering. Where there is real passion, usually there are > > changes in speaking tone, changes in body language, and apt > > gesturing. Obama showed none of those. Whoever that ‘attractive > > Black man from Chicago’ was, he was keeping the true identity of the > > speaker hidden from public view. That fact made me feel very uneasy, > > mostly, because other people, apparently, were only seeing the > > slender, suave and handsome man, and not seeing the likely psychosis > > lurking below that man’s surface. > > > Bill Kristol of the ‘Weekly Standard’, a supposed conservative > > magazine, is a regular ‘guest contributor’ on Fox News. On Chris > > Wallace’s show, Sunday, Kristol was his usual smiley self while he > > defended not firing policemen and librarians as part of needed budget > > cuts. Though I’ve never read a page of that magazine, I could > > immediately tell that Kristol is a liberal. His cast-in-stone smile > > also shows him to be a phony of the worst kind. When I was a kid, my > > father, who was a professional portrait photographer, told me that men > > don’t smile ‘naturally’, without being coaxed. I’ve observed that men > > who are not trustworthy will smile excessively to created the opposite > > illusion. > > > Bill O’Reilly smiles and chuckles his way though most of his shows. > > After interviewing Obama the night of the Super Bowl, O’Reilly said > > that Obama—who was all toothy-smiles the entire interview—is a > > friendly and likable man (gag… gag…). O’Reilly is this liberal > > Harvard luck-out with a moron’s IQ telling his like-minded viewers > > that THE most divisive and hurtful man to the country in US history > > is… likable. Regularly doing that on national TV, as O’Reilly does, > > is, I believe, aiding and abetting treason. For that reason, Bill > > O’Reilly should hang for treason right along side his idol, Obama, as > > part of the cleansing to rid corrupt socialist conspirators from our > > midst. > > > This week, Ron Paul got the highest number of straw votes for > > President at the CPAC convention. Three years ago Paul could have > > become President simply by saying these words: “The USA is broke > > financially. And the Federal Government is broke morally. No one in > > Washington considers the costs and the negative effects of the > > legislation being passed. With every new law, our civil liberties go > > down, and our share of the national debt goes… up. A logical solution > > to our failed government is to ratify a stronger New Constitution. > > The object of such should be to, once again, put the People in charge > > of government, rather than allowing government to keep thinking it is > > in charge of the People. To further that objective, I hereby RESIGN > > my House Seat in order to work for a better America by way of a New > > Constitution of the United States of America. I urge all patriots who > > agree with me to rally to that cause!” > > > But Ron Paul shrank back into obscurity amid the empty ritual of the > > Capital after saying, “Elections are for the short term. A Revolution > > will take longer.” Ron Paul doesn’t have… the (New) Constitution to > > lead a Revolution. But I do! > > > Two other prominent political or media figures who are clear PHONIES > > are former Governor Mike Huckabee and Former Governor Mitt Romney. > > Both of those are smile-aholics. “One glance at Huckabee’s smile > > could give dentists tooth decay!” No man who fakes playing a guitar > > on each of his sweet, sweet shows has the honesty and integrity to be > > a janitor at any church, let alone President of the USA. > > > Romney showed his true colors after the McCain-Palin ticket was > > finalized. Instead of smiles, I detected POISON in Romney’s bearing > > and in his remarks. In my opinion, the ‘dual personality’ of that man > > disqualifies him to ever be President. This country can’t ‘take’ two > > phony Presidents in a row! Though I never approved of George Bush > > invading Iraq, he was one of our more what-you-see-is what-you-get > > presidents. We should look for that kind of honesty in future > > presidents! > > > Of the ‘possibles’ for President, Newt Gingrich has many plusses. The > > man is smart and well-informed. There is a pleasantness and a > > seriousness in his bearing and delivery of message. He has a stable, > > reassuring quality, and an honest candor that makes the listener feel > > they are getting the truth, never a run-around. > > > The Donald has the smarts and the “Presidential Bearing” to be > > President. However, for leading a bankrupt nation, I’d shy away from > > anyone who has made borrowing money to get out of business binds an… > > art form. The USA cannot… borrow (or print) any more money! Only > > massive cutbacks (75%) will save us from our debt. Having “nice” > > police and “nice” librarians lose their jobs shouldn’t be a > > catastrophe if the removal of burdensome restrictions on businesses in > > this country creates another post war (WW II) boom. By working and > > saving during a booming economy, most people can provide for their own > > “security” for the future. Private insurance, shopped across state > > lines, should replace Medicare and > > ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
