Petty details, all. — J. A. A. — > On Apr 26, 5:29 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > The banner at the top of his official website > <http://www.algathafi.org/html-english/index.htm> spells it, "AL > Gathafi." But if you go deeper into the site, you'll see it variously > rendered as "Al Qaddafi," "Algathafi," and "Al-Gathafi." > > On 04/26/2011 12:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > Mark: Fox News (gag) is the only approximately tollerable news > > network I watch. They spell his name: Qaddafi. "G", why would that > > be? � J. A. A. � > > On Apr 25, 1:44 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote: > >> "G" it is. I believe he knows how to spell his own name.... > > >> On Apr 25, 7:18 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Thanks, Jonathan! Mark, with his 'G', is no closer to correct than > >>> my 'Q' but with ff. I'd rate the guy a double F grade. Agreed? � J. > >>> A. A. � > >>> On Apr 24, 11:37 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> His name in Arabic is /Mu?ammar al-Qad_d_a-fi-. / > >>>> On 04/24/2011 08:29 PM, Mark wrote: > >>>>> I am a Tico. We have monkeys. ..... Belgiums per capita income is no > >>>>> where near The US...It is much lower... Moslems are welcome here.... I > >>>>> never said I support Gaddafi.. please learn to spell his name if you > >>>>> are going to talk about him. > >>>>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, NoEinstein<[email protected] > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>> Mark: Where do you live with monkeys in your back yard? India? > >>>>> Because of the beauty of Belgium, making it a choice vacation > >>>>> destination, the per capita income in Belgium is higher than in the > >>>>> USA. You should move there. But my guess is that Muslims > >>>>> wouldn't be > >>>>> welcomed (said because you have defended Qadaffi). � J. A. A. > >>>>> � > >>>>> On Apr 22, 12:00 pm, Mark<[email protected] > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>> > What is happening in Belgium is not History but rather Current > >>>>> Events. > >>>>> > They have law enforcement, welfare (higher percentage that the > >>>>> US) their > >>>>> > food is protected and as you say ...on and on. All the shutdown > >>>>> causes > >>>>> > (without explicit instructions from congress and the President) > >>>>> is that > >>>>> > nothing NEW can take place. Supervisors still supervise, all > >>>>> State functions > >>>>> > still happen, all taxes are paid. > >>>>> > One would think that something as basic as > >>>>> > "Do we need Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court to > >>>>> survive?" > >>>>> > (answer is a resounding "No") > >>>>> > would be really important to a Constitutionalist. The States > >>>>> and those > >>>>> > Federal departments that are necessary to "the Public Welfare" > >>>>> are left > >>>>> > operating as usual. > >>>>> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, NoEinstein > >>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>wrote: > >>>>> > > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about > >>>>> Belgium. The > >>>>> > > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had > >>>>> > > government contracts would shut down; there would be no > >>>>> protected food > >>>>> > > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would > >>>>> surge; the > >>>>> > > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would > >>>>> start > >>>>> using > >>>>> > > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started > >>>>> > > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA > >>>>> can't > >>>>> > > survive without some the public order that is provided by > >>>>> well > >>>>> thought- > >>>>> > > out and agreed-to laws. > >>>>> > > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the > >>>>> masses) laws > >>>>> > > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient > >>>>> government will > >>>>> > > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their > >>>>> laws. Our > >>>>> > > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because > >>>>> Congress > >>>>> > > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run > >>>>> things. > >>>>> > > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! > >>>>> > >>>>> Read my > >>>>> > > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen, > >>>>> > > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any > >>>>> government > >>>>> > > employee or elected official, including the President! � > >>>>> J. A. > >>>>> > > Armistead � Patriot > >>>>> > > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark<[email protected] > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > Onestone, > >>>>> > > > At one full year with no government it is way past the > >>>>> "experimental" > >>>>> > > stage. > >>>>> > > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that > >>>>> cares. Just > >>>>> > > why > >>>>> > > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause > >>>>> civil > >>>>> war ?? The > >>>>> > > laws > >>>>> > > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples > >>>>> needs. > >>>>> > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein > >>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>> > > >wrote: > >>>>> > > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The > >>>>> USA would be > >>>>> > > > > in civil war... � J. A. A. � > >>>>> > > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley > >>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>> > > > > wrote: > >>>>> > > > > > John, > >>>>> > > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the > >>>>> stone > >>>>> age without > >>>>> > > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national > >>>>> government for more > >>>>> > > than > >>>>> > > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a > >>>>> government > >>>>> doesn't make > >>>>> > > much > >>>>> > > > > > of a difference in their daily lives." > >>>>> > > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > >>>>> > > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! > >>>>> Since I > >>>>> am an untra- > >>>>> > > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... > >>>>> "left" > >>>>> of anyone, > >>>>> > > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a > >>>>> God-damned > >>>>> liberal. I > >>>>> > > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because > >>>>> I am > >>>>> the exact > >>>>> > > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an > >>>>> anarchist more > >>>>> > > conservative > >>>>> > > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to > >>>>> the > >>>>> 'stone ages' > >>>>> > > > > > > within one month of there being no > >>>>> government(s). So, > >>>>> your "ideal" > >>>>> > > of > >>>>> > > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a > >>>>> soul on > >>>>> Earth. Is > >>>>> > > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. > >>>>> A. > >>>>> Armistead � > >>>>> > > > > Patriot > >>>>> > > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan > >>>>> Ashley<[email protected] > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>> > > > > > > wrote: > >>>>> > > > > > >> John, > >>>>> > > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can > >>>>> one > >>>>> be "right" of > >>>>> > > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as > >>>>> you > >>>>> NEVER answer > >>>>> > > > > > >> questions posed to you.) > >>>>> > > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > >>>>> > > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of > >>>>> anarchy is > >>>>> socialist. I > >>>>> > > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph > >>>>> constitution > >>>>> banning > >>>>> > > government. > >>>>> > > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't > >>>>> survive very long > >>>>> > > on > >>>>> > > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. � > >>>>> > > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley< > >>>>> > > [email protected] > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>> > > > > > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a > >>>>> socialist > >>>>> > > constitution. > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by > >>>>> attacking the > >>>>> capitalist > >>>>> > > system > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by > >>>>> supposing > >>>>> that government > >>>>> > > > > should > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). > >>>>> The fact > >>>>> that you > >>>>> > > even > >>>>> > > > > ask > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut > >>>>> reaction > >>>>> that you are a > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats > >>>>> are. > >>>>> The remaining > >>>>> > > 5% > >>>>> > > > > are > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those > >>>>> groups. � > >>>>> J. A. > >>>>> > > Armistead > >>>>> > > > > � > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Patriot > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley< > >>>>> > > [email protected] > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> John, > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that > >>>>> routinely > >>>>> downgrades > >>>>> > > websites > >>>>> > > > > based > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content > >>>>> relevance" says > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
