I am a Tico. We have monkeys. ..... Belgiums per capita income is no where near The US...It is much lower... Moslems are welcome here.... I never said I support Gaddafi.. please learn to spell his name if you are going to talk about him.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > Mark: Where do you live with monkeys in your back yard? India? > Because of the beauty of Belgium, making it a choice vacation > destination, the per capita income in Belgium is higher than in the > USA. You should move there. But my guess is that Muslims wouldn't be > welcomed (said because you have defended Qadaffi). — J. A. A. — > > > On Apr 22, 12:00 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > What is happening in Belgium is not History but rather Current Events. > > > > They have law enforcement, welfare (higher percentage that the US) their > > food is protected and as you say ...on and on. All the shutdown causes > > (without explicit instructions from congress and the President) is that > > nothing NEW can take place. Supervisors still supervise, all State > functions > > still happen, all taxes are paid. > > > > One would think that something as basic as > > > > "Do we need Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court to survive?" > > (answer is a resounding "No") > > > > would be really important to a Constitutionalist. The States and those > > Federal departments that are necessary to "the Public Welfare" are left > > operating as usual. > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, NoEinstein <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. The > > > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had > > > government contracts would shut down; there would be no protected food > > > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; the > > > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start using > > > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started > > > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't > > > survive without some the public order that is provided by well thought- > > > out and agreed-to laws. > > > > > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) laws > > > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government will > > > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their laws. Our > > > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because Congress > > > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run things. > > > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! Read my > > > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen, > > > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any government > > > employee or elected official, including the President! — J. A. > > > Armistead — Patriot > > > > > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Onestone, > > > > > > At one full year with no government it is way past the "experimental" > > > stage. > > > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that cares. > Just > > > why > > > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil war ?? > The > > > laws > > > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples needs. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would > be > > > > > in civil war... — J. A. A. — > > > > > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age > without > > > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for > more > > > than > > > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't > make > > > much > > > > > > of a difference in their daily lives." > > > > > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an > untra- > > > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of > anyone, > > > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I > > > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact > > > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more > > > conservative > > > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone > ages' > > > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your > "ideal" > > > of > > > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. > Is > > > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead > � > > > > > Patriot > > > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley< > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> John, > > > > > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" > of > > > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER > answer > > > > > > >> questions posed to you.) > > > > > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. > I > > > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning > > > government. > > > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very > long > > > on > > > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. � > > > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley< > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist > > > constitution. > > > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the > capitalist > > > system > > > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that > government > > > > > should > > > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you > > > even > > > > > ask > > > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are > a > > > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The > remaining > > > 5% > > > > > are > > > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. > > > Armistead > > > > > � > > > > > > >>>>> Patriot > > > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley< > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>> John, > > > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades > > > websites > > > > > based > > > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much > about > > > your > > > > > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of > > > > > expression means. > > > > > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and > social > > > harm > > > > > to the > > > > > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including > Hitler" > > > seems > > > > > > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to > > > pull > > > > > off this > > > > > > >>>>>> tremendous task? > > > > > > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American > > > multinational > > > > > > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, > > > California. > > > > > Google > > > > > > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you > are > > > > > very > > > > > > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's > neck > > > from > > > > > the > > > > > > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who > > > commit > > > > > > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on > > > > > moderation > > > > > > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should > be > > > > > killed? > > > > > > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those > who > > > > > kill > > > > > > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans > > > have > > > > > > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack > of > > > jobs > > > > > > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He > has > > > > > caused > > > > > > >>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other > > > person > > > > > who > > > > > > >>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler. > > > > > > >>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our > > > government > > > > > and > > > > > > >>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that > bastard > > > > > arrested, > > > > > > >>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the > > > Constitution > > > > > for > > > > > > >>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested > that > > > you, > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". > He's > > > > > viewed > > > > > > >>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I > suspect > > > you > > > > > are so > > > > > > >>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against > > > having a > > > > > > >>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. > Get > > > some > > > > > couch- > > > > > > >>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � > Patriot > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE< > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Einstein, > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under > the > > > > > present, or > > > > > > >>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received > is > > > the > > > > > standard > > > > > > >>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used > to > > > it. It > > > > > > >>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable > under > > > US > > > > > law. > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country > has > > > the > > > > > > >>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their > > > law(s). > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of > > > > > "reasoning" in > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was > explaining > > > why > > > > > Jews > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming > to > > > be > > > > > such > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for > > > > > successful > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep > > > wounds > > > > > Muslims > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> feel. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin > Ice > > > that > > > > > the USA > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's > > > responsibility?) > > > > > saying > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course > that in > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and > by > > > my > > > > > New > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from > his > > > job. > > > > > If you > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what > I'm > > > > > saying, > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New > > > > > Constitution has > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to > > > read. > > > > > The last > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have > batted > > > > > heads > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> with, > > > > ... > > > > read more » > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- *Mark M. Kahle H.* * * * * -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
