On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, mouss wrote: > Sahil Tandon a écrit : > > On Mar 15, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Henk van Oers wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Wietse Venema wrote: > >> > >>> Is it so hard to read what the text actually says, > >>> instead of what you want it to say? > >> > >> Yes. The semantics differ from what i'm used too in recipient_checks. > > > > > > Shall we close this thread? header_checks != smtpd_recipient_checks, > > and the functionality of both is explained in the documentation. > > > > smtpd_recipient_checks? what's that? > just kidding of course...
Mea culpa! smtpd_recipient_restrictions! :-) -- Sahil Tandon <sa...@tandon.net>
