> patpro--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]>: > > On 22/09/2026 19:26, Gerald Galster via Postfix-users wrote: >>> patpro--- via Postfix-users <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Then I tried many things like this: >>> >>> AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/5, 8.0.0.0/7, 11.0.0.0/8, 12.0.0.0/6, 16.0.0.0/4, >>> 32.0.0.0/3, 64.0.0.0/2, 128.0.0.0/2, 192.0.0.0/9, 192.128.0.0/11, >>> 192.160.0.0/13, 192.169.0.0/16, 192.170.0.0/15, 192.172.0.0/14, >>> 192.176.0.0/12, 192.192.0.0/10, 193.0.0.0/8, 194.0.0.0/7, 196.0.0.0/6, >>> 200.0.0.0/5, 208.0.0.0/4 >> In principle that should work. Did you verify that the routes are available >> (netstat -rn)? >> Is IP forwarding enabled (on the hardware node and inside the jail)? >> A quick search for FreeBSD and IP forwarding suggests: >> sysctl -w net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 or gateway_enable="YES" in rc.conf >> Use tcpdump to check all interfaces (wg* and vnet*) on your home mail server >> and >> the VPS to see if packets are being sent as intended. >>> I’ll give a try to your proposal of `AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0` plus a static >>> route in the Jail for 192.168.0.0/16 >> Check netstat -rn, a route for 192.168.2.0/24 should already be present. >> A route to 192.168.0.0/16 via vnet0 and (presumably) gateway 192.168.2.1 >> should only be necessary to reach 192.16.*.* outside of 192.168.2.*. > > > Thank you Gerald for your help. I feel like it’s really off-topic so I’ll try > to keep it short.
[You're right, replied off list] Best regards, Gerald _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
