On 7/30/2009 8:26 AM, Martijn de Munnik wrote: > I assume it is better to put the reject_unknown_recipient_domain and > reject_unverified_recipient controls after the rbls en policy services. > This way only address verification is needed when the mail passes the > rbls en policies?
Actually, I think it should be the other way around... You want to put the least expensive checks first... reject_unverified_recipient is, I believe, much cheaper than RBL lookups... but maybe I'm wrong? -- Best regards, Charles
