Dear MrC

> MrC <lists-post...@cappella.us> [2009-08-04 17:53]:
>
> On 8/4/2009 1:02 AM, Lukas Ruf wrote:
>
>>> On Monday 03 August 2009 15:34:59 Lukas Ruf wrote:
>>>> I cannot understand why Postfix/cleanup rejects particular Subject
>>>> lines, since I have been searching for the respective regexps but
>>>> haven't found what I've been looking for.  My question is simple:
>>>> why are subject lines rejected that I cannot find definitions for?
>>>
>>> Probably because they match expressions in your undisclosed [!!]
>>> file of header_checks(5).
>>>
>>
>> Please find attached the header_checks file currently in use:
>>
>
> This header_checks file is out of control.  It rejects many perfectly
> reasonable Subjects:
>

Thank you very much for your reply! It dates back to somewhen in
2003....

>
> Spend some time learning about REs.  And consider instead of this
> monstrosity header_checks file a content filter or other more sufficient
> means.
>
> If you must use header_check rules, include unique identifiers at the
> end of your REJECTs so that you can find which ones hit.  See example
> with <---- HERE above.
>
> See:
> http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
> http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
> http://www.postfix.org/CONTENT_INSPECTION_README.html

Thank you very much for the recommendation.  I definitely will!

wbr,
Lukas
-- 
Lukas Ruf       <http://www.lpr.ch> | Ad Personam
Consecom  <http://www.consecom.com> | Ad Laborem

Reply via email to