Am 25.02.2013 22:39, schrieb Birta Levente: > > On 25/02/2013 22:59, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 25.02.2013 21:54, schrieb Birta Levente: >>> On 25/02/2013 12:38, marcos gonzalez wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Thanks for the answer. >>>> >>>> I'm reading how more of you separates http of mail, is correct but If you >>>> needs the same SSL certificate for more >>>> than one domain, and for legal questions you can't include all domains in >>>> one certificate, I don't know If >>>> postfix has the possibility to create a table domains where you can say " >>>> for this domain this certificate". I >>>> know is a very special case and not's typical to do, and for this I prefer >>>> to comment to this list. >>>> >>>> If anyone knows how to create this rule, be grateful >>>> >>> I use multiple certificate on multiple domains with multiple postfix >>> instances :) >>> >>> http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html >> have fun if you are growing up to 100, 200, 300, 500 domains >> >> ypur administration overhead will grow dramatically for zero >> benefit or you have sooner or later to go back to a unified >> servername >> >> the idiot who was admin befor eme also thought it is cool >> to have "mail.domain.tld" and communicate it for his 5 >> domains, now as we are have some hundret of them i am >> happy that i have made the step to unify it to "mail.thelounge.net" >> with ONE certificate and ONE ip-address for keep things simple >> > > Absolutely right. But in my case (and possibly others) it's about 10 domains > ... and only 2 have different > certificate/IP .... because ...well ... they have ... it's from situation to > situation...
so setup a vritual machine for them or explain them that it is useless - the argumentation is simple: price let them pay enough to maintain their VN's and if they do not want to pay, well, give them a setup which works for 100, 500, 1000, 5000 domains perfectly
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
