Requested config dump

alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
always_bcc = smtp@custom_smtp_transp...@example.com
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
dc_destination_concurrency_limit = 100
dc_destination_recipient_limit = 100
dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
inet_interfaces = all
inet_protocols = all
mailbox_size_limit = 0
message_size_limit = 26214400
mydestination = mail.example.com localhost.example.com, localhost,
ip-xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx.us-west-2.compute.internal
mydomain = example.com
myhostname = mail.example.com
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 172.31.0.0/16 10.0.1.0/24
myorigin = example.com
readme_directory = no
recipient_delimiter = +
relayhost =
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtp_scache
smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Ubuntu)
smtpd_client_connection_count_limit = 100
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions = check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10031
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_client_access
hash:/etc/postfix/policyd_override, check_policy_service inet:
127.0.0.1:10031, permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unlisted_recipient,reject_unauth_destination,
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, reject_invalid_helo_hostname,
reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org, reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.2,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.3, reject_rbl_client
dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.4, reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.5,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.7, reject_rbl_client
dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.9,reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.11,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.12, warn_if_reject
reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org, warn_if_reject
reject_rhsbl_sender abuse.rfc-ignorant.org, warn_if_reject
reject_rhsbl_sender whois.rfc-ignorant.org, warn_if_reject
reject_rhsbl_sender bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org, warn_if_reject
reject_rhsbl_sender postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org, permit
smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated
defer_unauth_destination
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtpd_sasl_exceptions_networks = $mynetworks
smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/certs/example.com-gd_bundle-g2-g1.crt
smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/example.com.crt.pem
smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/private/example.com.key.pem
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
smtpd_use_tls = yes
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
virtual_alias_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
virtual_gid_maps = static:8
virtual_mailbox_base = /vmstore/vmail/
virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/
mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf
virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/
mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
virtual_minimum_uid = 7777
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:7777

Thanks in advance.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:34 AM Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org>
wrote:

>
> > On Feb 16, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Travis Dolan <travis.do...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I am working from the following data
> >
> > qshape deferred = TOTAL 10
> > qshape -s deferred = TOTAL 9
> >
> > qshape active = TOTAL 2819
> > qshape -s active = TOTAL 1469
> >
> > If I am reading these results incorrectly please let me know.
> >
> > No mail sits on any form of a file server, all queues are local to
> sending server.
> >
> > You mentioned clocks, that could be a potential issue. The sending
> server in this case is UTC, and the receiving server is PST. How would this
> manifest itself?
>
> This might be a good time to post "posconf -n" output.
>
> Throughput = concurrency/latency.  If the active queue
> occupancy for this destination is high, either the latency
> is high or the concurrency is low.
>
> Running "postsuper -r", and setting excessive concurrency
> limits is likely to make things worse.
>
> --
>         Viktor.
>

Reply via email to